Dating apps are kind of like social networking sites. They both take a tremendous amount of money to get off the ground and are very difficult to monetize.
Tinder was different because the goal is not to have a long-term relationship (and leave the app).
I also care about democracy. I hope that in the future, the DNC doesn't collude with the mainstream media to destroy any real chances of a third-party in this country.
Since they haven't apologized to the American public for doing so and instead keep doubling-down on emotional rhetoric, I don't want them anywhere near the white house.
I really hate Trump. But I hate that you pushed me to vote for him because the alternative meant that this politically correct toxic culture would continue to saturate all parts of our society.
I support resistance. The resistance against the anti-fascists who are beating people up in our streets and threatening someone with violence for speaking their mind. If their idea is ridiculous, have a civil debate and stop using violence in an attempt to win an argument.
What a nonsense - the violence has been minimal, and no more than the usual violent idiots you get in any situation, from any group.
Also, I would buy you not wanting to vote for a DNC candidate because of the way they handle their primaries or whatever, sure. The idea you'd be willing to vote for a GOP candidate after their blatent disregard for the public, truth and democracy is laughable.
If you are claiming you want to punish the DNC by withholding your vote from them, sure, fine. Rewarding the GOP for the way they acted? A joke. Completely undermines your point.
This just reads like so many of the comments I've read recently - focusing on the very small negatives of 'the left' while completely ignoring the huge issues from 'the right'. It's such a nonsense.
I think violence is only a pretty fringe part of the movement. It's like KKK members who support Trump. They definitely exist but they are a very small percentage of his actual supporters
There it is; they were "pushed" to vote for him.
What do you say about someone who decides instead of incrementally fixing a problem with discipline and superior solutions and consensus, instead decides to spin the wheel with an unknown, likely setting decades of labor and institutions on fire, when vulnerable real lives are at stake.
Exactly how an immature child behaves, flipping the game board, without regard for anyone else.
And all that horrible "politically correctness", aka having manners and respecting others regardless of your own bad upbringing, racism, prejudices, and ignorance; actually demonstrating their own emotional limitations and refusal to evolve.
GOP leader calling for a Kent State again; is that what you mean? The violence is on both sides, a small minority and you know it.
Services like Uber are replacing what used to be a stable job by fewer drivers with a job now done by many more drivers for peanuts. It's almost a way of taking an industry and redistributing the wealth.
> Services like Uber are replacing what used to be a stable job by fewer drivers with a job now done by many more drivers for peanuts.
Right idea, wrong complaint.
GPS is the automated tool that killed the Taxi. There was a time when it took specialized knowledge to know the layout of a city. GPS took away the one edge the Taxi-industry had... experience in driving and roads.
Uber is just the first major company to take advantage of cheap GPS technology. As soon as GPS-systems were so cheap that they are in literally everybody's pockets... the Taxicab industry became an endangered species.
No, not really. When I travel to a new city, I always use a Taxi to get around. GPS actually helps out the taxi drivers because I don't need to sit there explaining exactly where to go. I can just tell them the address. In a foreign country, it's even better: Just give them a business card or piece of paper with the address on it.
"Uber is just the first major company to take advantage of cheap GPS technology."
Uber is the first major company to avoid all of the taxi unions and the medallion systems and hire any driver off the street for what amounts to some extra beer money for the drivers.
It's really convenient and nice for consumers, but guts the industry of jobs that could actually earn someone a real living.
"the Taxicab industry became an endangered species."
Again, no it didn't. I'm not sure how much traveling you have done but when you need to get somewhere on time, Trains and Subways don't really cut it. You need to take a taxi.
Unless we have an instant form of travel without cars, we will always have a need for taxis.
Uber did, however, show us that when unions are in place and create a monopoly in an industry, they really have no incentive to actually make things better for the consumer.
> Uber is the first major company to avoid all of the taxi unions and the medallion systems and hire any driver off the street for what amounts to some extra beer money for the drivers.
Oh come on. As if these Uber drivers would have been able to navigate an unknown neighborhood in the 1980s.
The enabling technology here is the GPS, specifically the free GPS in everybody's smartphone. Without that, the entire Uber model fails because the typical Uber Driver has no navigation skills.
The driver's GPS made driving more accessible. But the passenger's GPS was even more important, because tourists finally know when they're being ripped off.
When I see these allegations, I often wonder if we are looking at it from the wrong side.
Yes, someone black might be getting paid $10K/less on average. The question is, do they have the same amount of education and experience as their non-black counterpart?
If not, then we need to figure out why there aren't as many qualified black candidates.
Instead, the answer seems to just have a quota of black applications, which really doesn't help anyone.
Donald Trump is the answer to the question: Do we really want our politicians taking in millions of dollars for favors, colluding with the mainstream media to destroy our chances of a true third-party candidate, and lying to the public about everything?
With all of the bitching and moaning about Trump from the left, nobody has learned from their mistakes. Most of us didn't even want Trump. We were just sick and tired of the mainstream media calling us racists, sexists, and bigots for merely having an opinion that questions the current narrative.
Enjoy the next 4 years and learn how to accept and talk to the people you may not agree with politically.
It's ironic that the group that claims they are the most open-minded, show their true colors when faced with opposing viewpoints.
This happened to me with two different friends and two different startups.
Many people love the idea of a startup: getting rich, being a tech rock star, and retiring early. Most aren't willing to do what it actually takes to succeed: unpleasant work, long hours, and sometimes little pay off for a long time.
One of my co-founders thought that 'writing something off' meant we could spend money on whatever we wanted and the government would pay for it.
Another friend had me meet with his lawyer and wanted me to sign an agreement where anything I worked on outside of our business together was property of the business (I had 2 other successful companies already running and he knew it) but all of his current work was solely owned by him.
Before I had a chance to tell him 'fuck no', he flaked out and got a job. Since then, he's onto his 3rd startup job and I've been running my successful companies.
Luckily, both startups were in such early phases, I was able to get out early.
I learned the hard lesson that your co-worker or friend doesn't necessarily make a good co-founder. A very small percentage of people will be disciplined enough to see a company from start to success. There are also different stages of a company. In the beginning with no real roles defined, a person might be great. When you become an actual company with products, meetings, deadlines, and customers. That same person might not work out.
Choose your co-founder wisely or you will go through lots of pain and suffering. Don't partner with an 'ideas' person unless they are investing money or giving you important contacts into an industry. If not, it will be difficult to put them into a position later when the company gets to the next stage.
Let's be honest here. Silicon Valley only wants 'openness to immigration' because they can get cheap labor and the H1B Visa makes it very difficult for a person to move to another job when they get here.
It's all about money. Don't let any of these feel-good articles make you think differently.
I also find it ironic that the same people that complain that there needs to be an increase in the minimum wage also want to flood the market with cheap labor from overseas, which will reduce American's wages.
> Let's be honest here. Silicon Valley only wants 'openness to immigration' because they can get cheap labor and the H1B Visa makes it very difficult for a person to move to another job when they get here.
Silicon Valley would probably be quite happy with a policy which allowed less overhead for visas without any visa-related job mobility restrictions. They fight for more H-1Bs not because they particularly like the H-1B, but because it's what they have, and it's a lot easier to win (or at least avoid a big loss) over quotas than over the fundamental structure of the immigration system.
"President Trump’s recent executive order is not only potentially unconstitutional, but deeply un-American. We are a nation of immigrants, after all. In the tech world,"
We are a nation of immigrants. Trump didn't institute a Muslim ban. He instituted a temporary ban from 7 specific countries for 90 days. This is only until we have a better vetting system.
Obama did something similar in 2009 when he temporarily banned Iraqi citizens for 6 months. I didn't hear a peep out of anyone. Why?
The only flaw I see in his executive order is the fact that he didn't give anyone enough time to implement it and it caused compete chaos. There also should have been some exemptions for travelers or green card holders.
I have many friends that are legal, US citizens and came to the US through legitimate means. Glorifying illegal immigration is a slap in the face to all the people that went through all of the proper channels to get citizenship.
"Right now, Lady Liberty’s lamp is dimming"
It's not. It's getting brighter. We finally have a president that cares about the citizens of this country. I feel like many immigrants that do come here don't really love the country that they are calling their new home.
If I wore a "Make America Great Again" hat in public, I would risk getting spit on and beat up. The real brown-shirt fascists are the anti-trump fanatics that won't actually have a civil debate and use violence towards people they don't like.
When there is a seemingly civil debate, fascists on social media will attempt to destroy the person's personal life and get them fired from their job or boycott their company and put them out of business.
I was able to get 5000 signups in a month for a product I was releasing. The product never really came to fruition (problems with my co-founder).
But, the marketing strategy still worked pretty well.