The only major pitch hit I've experienced was in the side of the head, so I was spared the immediate jolt and pain by simply having my next conscious moment on the ground.
Also, it was probably going 50mph or something relatively low compared to what this talks about.
There's a difference between a lapse in memory and being knocked unconscious. It's not at all uncommon to simply not remember the moment of impact and a second or so after, whatever it is that's doing the impacting.
Eh, this was a pickup game - no helmets, just kids playing. I was actually walking away from the box because I had to leave so I'm not really sure why it was thrown at me. Didn't find out either, just scowled and left. And it was only a few seconds of being unaware. I wasn't completely limp, just was walking out and then I was suddenly on my hands and knees.
Completely as an aside, I thought it was going to be about a sales pitch.
Something I'd note is that the major league pitchers are pretty amazing, but I've gone to a few minor league games. In the minors (perhaps depending on the league), a pitcher rarely lasts for an entire game, and their accuracy goes to hell as their arm turns to rubber. Their last one or two pitches before being relieved could go practically anywhere.
The hitters also seem aware of this, and become more wary as a pitcher gets worn down.
There's still an idea of wearing the pitcher out in the majors. Of course, if you're an ace throwing no-nos then you can routinely go 110+ pitches per game. Most pitchers go about 60-70. The bullpen is stacked with varying arms and pitch types to throw off hitters their 3rd+ time through.
Someone more familiar with baseball than me - could you explain the "rules" behind retributive "hitting the batter" with pitches? I've heard rumblings that pitchers will intentionally return the favor when their own teammates get hit. Anyone have any insight into this?
It broadly falls into two categories. The first, rarer case is trading beanballs (pitches that hit the batter). Pitchers routinely pitch inside, or close to the batter, to get him to back away from the plate (making it harder to hit pitches that are on the side of the plate opposite the batter). Sometimes, though, the pitcher's command isn't as good as he thinks it is, and he hits the batter when he tries this. If this happens a few times (once or twice can be an accident; more is seen as reckless/intentional), the other team's pitcher might throw near or at a batter on the first pitcher's team. Sometimes, in this case or the second version, the pitcher who throws at someone is the person targeted for retaliation, but this is complicated by the fact that, in one of the two divisions that compose Major League Baseball, pitchers do not have to hit, which means you can't directly target the person who is targeting your teammates.
The second, and more common, is a perceived violation of baseball's unwritten rules. There are a lot of these, but they mostly boil down to "don't have too much fun" and are exceedingly stupid. Things that are seen as violations of these unwritten rules include:
- Hitting a home run and watching it go over the wall
- Taking too long to run around the bases after hitting a home run
- Taking too long to go to first base after drawing a walk
- Flipping your bat after a hit
- Stealing a base while you're up by a lot or down by a lot
- Bunting for a hit (trying to tap the ball with your bat rather than really hit it) to break up a no-hitter (a game where a pitcher has not surrendered any hits, a very rare occurrence)
Basically, pitchers are sensitive babies and they will throw a 95 MPH projectile at you if you hurt their feelings by being better than them. Sometimes breaking these rules will result in an exchange of hit-by-pitch events (you hit my guy, whether arbitrarily "justified" or not, so I hit you/your guy). Bizarrely, this is tolerated, but if the hitter decides he wants retaliation in an equally violent way (say, by walking up to the pitcher and punching him), this is considered completely unacceptable. I love baseball, but it's a really dumb sport in some ways.
"Basically, pitchers are sensitive babies and they will throw a 95 MPH projectile at you if you hurt their feelings by being better than them"
First of all, I basically agree with your assessment here. But I'll try to argue the other side, anyway: it's not about being better than them; it's about "showing them up."
The idea is that, look, you just bested me. Good for you! But to draw unnecessary attention to it or to celebrate it ostentatiously is unsportsmanlike and (one might even say) a personal affront. What was simply a fair act of competition has now turned to gloating or even ridicule.
Rightly or wrongly, it's the perception of impropriety that calls for retaliation.
A) many of these same pitchers will yell/pound their gloves/clap/point to the sky/cross themselves when they successfully strike someone out or get out of a tight situation, which by their own logic suggests that someone should throw a 95 MPH projectile at them as soon as possible
and
B) even if someone bests you in a competition and then gloats about it (even if they gloat about it excessively! to absurd degree!), that does not give you license to throw a 95 MPH projectile at them. You should try to best them next time within the rules of the game.
and
C) many of the situations described above are not in fact "gloating" or "unnecessary attention" or "ostentatious" except by the absurd standards of American baseball. All of the people on earth who, right now, could hit a home run against a major league player could probably fit comfortably in a high school gym with space left over. And even among that subset, most who have the opportunity achieve it incredibly rarely. If you hit a home run, watching it go over the wall and smiling is not excessive. That is a reasonable reaction to hitting a home run in major league baseball! That is a very cool and rare thing to achieve. It is worth celebrating.
Essentially, none of it "calls for retaliation". If the pitcher doesn't want the batter to watch a home run they hit off of him, he should throw better pitches that do not allow the batter to hit a home run. And if he can't do that and he wants to throw a tantrum and physically attack the batter instead, he should be ejected and suspended.
I have to say I'm not really moved by language like, "95 MPH projectile" that seeks to exaggerate the risk involved. Your argument would be stronger without it.
Yes, but descriptions that reduce complex interactions to their simplest form -- e.g. baseball is "grown men hitting a ball with a stick" -- is an old trick to conceal complexity for dubious motives.
It's true that baseball is, in fact, grown men hitting a ball with a stick, but it isn't merely that. We all understand that that description is designed to ridicule something that is much bigger than its parts.
So, yes, yours is a literal description, but it's also a clumsy and unnatural account that's crafted to manipulate the reader.
Which is fine, as far as it goes; I just think your argument would be stronger without it.
Not sure about unwritten rules, but it's usually not a very good idea anyways. If you're down by a lot, you're going to need so many people to get on base that you're going to have ended up scoring anyways, so it's generally not worth the risk of an out unless you think that the risk of a double play is higher than you getting thrown out.
I honestly don't know. I just remember Kerry Wood getting really mad about it one time - I assume it's because it seems pointless (although obviously, it could be huge, depending on what happens afterwards), but stolen bases allowed get scored against the pitcher?
Yeah, like whether or not you're supposed to run on a pop-fly. That was the first and last rule I bothered to learn.
The real rule is that if someone else doesn't know the rules, their entire team flies into a blinding rage, and ostracizes them without explaining the reason for the rule.
That's not an unwritten rule. That's a strategy. If you're on base and you run on a pop fly, you're likely to get out before tagging up and give the other team a double play. Not sure why the team getting the double play would be mad though...
The likelihood of retaliation is more or less proportional to talent level of the player you hit. Retaliation is much more likely if you hit the cleanup hitter vs 8th or 9th man in the lineup. The reason for this is to protect good hitters from constantly being pitched inside with reckless abandon.
If the umpire thinks it's intentional then the pitcher will be ejected. Or if only the batter thinks it was intentional then you might have a brawl https://youtu.be/4APOqlpyseM
I'm sure entire books have been written on this, but yes, it happens all the time. There's all kinds of unwritten rules about how you should do it, when, and to whom.
Years ago, a badly adjusted pitching machine put a batting-cage ball off my left thumb. It was probably set for 60 mph, for I doubt I could have hit anything faster. But batting-cage balls are made for durability, to hold up under constant hitting by aluminum bats. In other words, they are damn hard. I did not enjoy it.
Could the guy at bat who gets hit charge the pitcher and wack him with the bat? If the pitcher can use the ball to try and kill you why would the league punish you for trying to use the bat to hit the pitcher?
Not using a bat as a weapon seems to be some unwritten rule of baseball. And rightfully so IMO, a bat could end someone's career, and falls squarely into 'criminal assault' territory.
Consider it a MAD strategy if you will - if YOU use a bat, then that opens the doors to someone using it against you(r team) someday.
Also, it was probably going 50mph or something relatively low compared to what this talks about.