Yes, but descriptions that reduce complex interactions to their simplest form -- e.g. baseball is "grown men hitting a ball with a stick" -- is an old trick to conceal complexity for dubious motives.
It's true that baseball is, in fact, grown men hitting a ball with a stick, but it isn't merely that. We all understand that that description is designed to ridicule something that is much bigger than its parts.
So, yes, yours is a literal description, but it's also a clumsy and unnatural account that's crafted to manipulate the reader.
Which is fine, as far as it goes; I just think your argument would be stronger without it.
It's true that baseball is, in fact, grown men hitting a ball with a stick, but it isn't merely that. We all understand that that description is designed to ridicule something that is much bigger than its parts.
So, yes, yours is a literal description, but it's also a clumsy and unnatural account that's crafted to manipulate the reader.
Which is fine, as far as it goes; I just think your argument would be stronger without it.