Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more frasierman's comments login

Thanks!

Yeah, I'm not quite sure how to prevent human error without everyone having barcode sticker printers, which seems extremely unlikely.


Automated barcode sticker vending machines attached to parking meters?


I totally see where you're coming from, but since the system is mostly automated (as far as I can tell), it'd be just as easy for them to grab from a DB than to try and parse out an adress and postage.

I didn't really start mailing things until the last 3-4 years, so I must admit that I don't know how the system worked previously.

While I agree that it wouldn't be immediately adopted, I don't think it would require too much work on their end to make it work. It's probably naive, and I don't fully understand the system now, so I may be totally wrong, but this was just my idea.


Have you ever gotten things in the mail? Even junk mail?

If so, you may have noticed that your mail is ultimately delivered by a human. Someone who has to be able to grab a handful of mail out of their bag and perform a quick visual check that yes, everything in this bundle actually goes to this address. Someone who might have a hundred bundles destined for an apartment building, and would like to be able to quickly parse the addresses to put them into the proper mailbox instead of having to type a long, cryptic ID into a smartphone, and hope they continue to have connectivity.

Any proposed new addressing system also needs to deal with the fact that the postal service serves EVERYONE. Even people way out in the middle of nowhere who have no cellular service. The ONLY processing power available to those mail carriers is their own brain, so it pretty much HAS to be human-readable.

All of the things you complain about in the address are USEFUL redundancy. Including all of that stuff makes it more likely that mail will get to its destination in the event of the ink being smeared (or running due to being rained on). It's more data that's useful in error correction.

Also, if you are mailing out many things and hate copying the info manually, let me introduce you to a concept called "printable address labels" and "mail merge". I recently had to mail out about a hundred books after a successful Kickstarter; I manually addressed maybe three of them. I put books in mailing envelopes, put the labels on the envelopes, sealed them shut, and brought them to the post office. They figured out how much it would cost me to mail them. I paid with a credit card. It really wasn't a major hassle at all.


This is true. Presently, I don't know my mail carrier, because I moved, but where I grew up, we knew them. If someone mis-addressed a letter, the carrier would deliver it to the right person. They could deliver using the family's name, rather than the address. Back when people hand-addressed personal letters, errors were common.

back in the day, back in the day...


Realistically too, the post office is running on a shoestring budget. I don't quite understand their biggest overhead costs (beyond paying out salaries and pension benefits to postal employees) but there has to be a way to make the mail system work the way it's worked but at less cost to tax payers.


Until this 2006 law that requires the pension to be fully funded for 75 years, and that this be achieved in three more years, the USPS was self sufficient. Postage paid for everything. No cost to the taxpayer. I remember when this was achieved in the 80s - it was on TV. This link has a lot of detail about the USPS.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/uspsabout....


Until this 2006 law that requires the pension to be fully funded for 75 years, and that this be achieved in three more years, the USPS was self sufficient.

Well, self sufficient if you ignore their pension obligations.

The same logic says that if I run a business with $100 in revenue, that pays $50 in cash and $75 in IOUs to suppliers, it's profitable.


I've emailed both Linode and Name.com asking if I can pay for his domain and hosting to continue on for eternity.

http://d.pr/i/2ysc (and they're looking into it - https://twitter.com/namedotcom/status/290111405410091008)

http://d.pr/i/CEji


Hi fraiserman, I would be honored to have the privilege of splitting the costs with you in perpetuity.

Aaron had an uncanny physical resemblance to my younger brother, and because of that, I couldn't help but feel a stronger connection to Aaron beyond his courageous activism, original thoughts, and entrepreneurship.

I can be reached on twitter at @hkmurakami. Thanks for considering.


You need root access to his linode. Eventually something on his instance will break and take everything down with it.

Even if you keep the bills paid forever, the only long-term solution is to focusing on archiving static copies of everything you can.


I second this


Followup: Got a response from Name.com... it looks like the only thing they can do in this situation is transfer the domain to next of kin (rather then letting someone else be the billing contact)

Hopefully the Swartz estate understands how much his works mean to people and decide to keep the domain and hosting running.

Thank you all for your offers to donate, hopefully his estate will let us donate directly to them.


Let us know if you want contributions to help offset it. Count me in.



Quick note about CAPTCHAs... A more accurate rate is $1.50 per 1000, and that's even a tad expensive.

If you buy in bulk, it's much cheaper.

Source: Security researcher.


Wow... this looks really awesome!

Some ideas: - An iPhone app or web interface - Allow you to upload a photo as a response - Some sort of API to add things like "How many emails did you send?" or "How many Twitter followers did you gain?" - Some way to pay you... I'd hate to start using this for a few months only to see it go away

Other then that, keep up the great work!


Hey, appreciate the feedback.

My concern with building an iPhone app or interface is that shifts the tool from being a fill out in a few minutes at the end of the day tool to a fill in stuff as it happens type tool, which is what I think discourages people from continuing with it long term. You might be interested in Daytum if this approach suites you: http://daytum.com/

As far as paying, thank you for the offer. I'm mainly looking for feedback right now; will likely charge folks down the road via some freemium model (and you all will be grandfathered in).

Thanks again!


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: