Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No.

There is a website that still exists called ChristianMingle.com. I just checked their signup process and for the question "how often do you go to church?" you have to choose between "on special occasions" to "every week". You also have to choose one of what they consider to be Christian sub-groups. You have to choose a race.

You cannot answer "never" or "atheist". You have to choose one of the options or they will not complete the registration process. They refuse to serve your dating needs.

This site and hundreds like it are totally legal in the US.




> This site and hundreds like it are totally legal in the US.

Maybe only because they haven't been sued yet? E-Harmony got sued in a class action lawsuit because they didn't support same-sex matching[1]. They ended up settling out of court and establishing a site that does same-sex matching, because it wasn't clear to them that they would win the lawsuit.

[1] http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/EHarmony-sued-for-excl...

See also http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection....

To be fair all this stuff seems like concern trolling to me, but it's also not clear to my non-lawyer self that it is totally legit.


This is a more substantive question but there's a lot of evidence it's not a problem. According to your article, eHarmony was sued in 2008, created the "separate but equal" site, and then merged them in 2012 after more complaints.

However, 3 years later, they still have separate portals for people interested in dating specific people:

http://www.eharmony.com/asian-dating/

http://www.eharmony.com/black-dating/

http://www.eharmony.com/r/christian-dating-1/ etc.

More analysis of the general right of association in light of private groups setting rules for membership is here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_Scouts_of_America_membersh...


Those portals are nominally for finding someone else of that race/religion - they don't prevent you from signing up if you're not a member of the group (I checked). That is the part that seems like it might not fly under California law - Jopwell is a business; so I don't see how they can legally deny accommodations based on race. I don't think the issue is with a company using Jopwell to find candidates, but rather with Jopwell telling white people that they are denied service due to race.

If you think that is OK, I don't see how you could be against a recruiting company that always rejected nonwhite candidates for placement (but didn't have that as part of their explicit mission).


I think this is a fair question, and I'm sure they'll address it in whatever way is necessary. As a startup, it's best to have a focus, otherwise you're just another generic recruiter.

It's possible that they'll need to tweak how they express that focus in terms of site design and onboarding process. I mean, if a site as big as eHarmony had to change their approach, it's quite likely a startup will run into similar issues. (I haven't tried signing up with Jopwell to see how they implemented the workflow, so I have no idea what it says currently.)

Thank you for the meaningful conversation.


What does this have to do with Facebook only giving accounts to people that meet certain conditions?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: