Makes you wonder if all that praise for design is really why Apple was successful, or if it was more because he pushed the limits of the law and was successful the way the old robber barons were, like a Rockefeller or Carnegie.
While the various trust violations and other assholery bumped up Apple's profits, they hardly provide enough benefit on their own to be responsible for Apple's success.
Unless we find out that Steve Jobs went around holding a gun to people's heads to force everyone to buy iPods, iPhones and iPads.
Telecom companies do the same stuff as far as pushing the limits of the law and they are pretty universally reviled. Apple is successful because it provides things to people that they really want and like.
