Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Oracle can charge $40-$100k+ for EE including options per core (times .5)...and some workloads are very cache sensitive. So a high cache, high bandwidth, high frequency, high memory capacity 16 core CPU[1] (x2 socket) might be the best bang for their buck for that million dollar+ license.

[1] https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/server/epyc/9005-...






It is very Oracle that their license policy gives a reason to make crippled CPUs.

Surely that's a good reason for Oracle to increase their prices even more, leading to a cat-and-mouse game between CPU makers and software license sellers.

Oh yes, this cat-and-mouse game has been going on for more than a decade. But despite that, for any given time and license terms, there is a type of CPU that is optimal for performance/licensing costs, and when the license is as expensive and widely used as it is, it makes sense to sell CPUs for that specific purpose.

Hopefully ending when nobody uses Oracle.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: