Definitely a win for the UK tech scene and US/UK tech collaboration/M&A in general. Having met Mike on several occasions, it’s clear he’s a huge asset to the AI startup ecosystem here in the UK. Certainly feels like justice has been served in one of the world’s most epic cases of buyer remorse. HP have managed to appear spectacularly hapless from this whole decade+ episode and simultaneously trash their reputation as a buyer. Who on earth would want to risk selling their business to HP now.
I worked at Autonomy in the 90's, back when there were a handful of engineers crammed in one room in St John's Innovation Center. It was a lot of fun and a very interesting learning experience. But I quit, because they wanted me to lie to customers all the time and I wasn't comfortable with that. A typical day in the life: fly to a dotcom with more money than sense, install software. Discover sales guy advertised it to have functionality it absolutely doesn't have. Claim I must have done something wrong and I needed to check with "more senior" engineers. Go back to hotel and overnight hack together some approximation of what had been sold.
I can't say whether particular allegations of accounting fraud are true, and startups are not exactly famous for truth in advertising, but that was the culture from the very earliest days.
that's my experience with multiple silicon valley startups in general. Sell what they believe they can have in the future against what a competitor sells today.
I questioned it, but to an extent its somewhat how even larger companies behave (i.e. not uncommon fo them to do a fundamentally non functional demo of a feature that they hope to have out at some point in the future)
> Years of legal wrangling followed. HP shareholders sued in 2012. In 2015, HP sued Lynch and Sushovan Hussain, former Autonomy CFO, in the High Court of England and Wales. Lynch responded by filing a $150 million countersuit for defamation.
Now that he's been found not guilty, does that strengthen his defamation claim? Between an extradition and how much his name has been dragged through the mud, that's quite a lot of damage.
Depends on where he filed. If he had filed in the US, he would have no chance at all.
In the UK, he has a much stronger chance, but then, in the UK, HP did win a civil lawsuit against him and the CFO, so Lynch can't argue that HP showed a reckless disregard for the truth.
As always, it'll probably come down to some sort of quiet monetary settlement.
That's a weird end to a crazy story. 2.5 month trial, completely acquitted. What's the takeaway here? Did HP make some horrible mistake and totally mismanage the acquisition as alleged?
Yup. For example at the time I was IT director of a doc com in the UK. Autonomy came to me and pitched their product, which was basically an enterprise-wide indexer thing which you could point at a file share and it would index all the documents, including looking inside MS Office files and then you could search it all. So quite far ahead of its time for what must have been like 1999 or so.
I told them their product didn't really meet any pressing need we had and was a bit expensive so thanks but no thanks. They came back with the proposal that instead of buying the software I could buy (from them) a really expensive NAS and they would throw the indexer in for free and the advantage for me would be that because it was hardware the expenditure could be written off against tax over time as depreciation.
It sounded sketchy so I didn't bite, but in essence they pitched me on the exact fraudulent thing that he was acquitted of.
Nothing sketchy about that per se, but the fraud element of the case centred around the allegation that autonomy didn't correctly account for the distinction between hardware and software sales when giving numbers to HP leading to an inflated (software based) multiple being used for the valuation at acquisition.
They were (allegedly) selling expensive disk drives for cost plus and telling investors they were making a software sale which obviously have very different growth characteristics as businesses.
Presumably based on intent. In the extreme case, you'd be selling someone a lettuce for a lot of money with "free" bundled software (so that they can then get some kind of tax write-off when the lettuce goes rotten).
Exactly, the takeaway here is that Meg Whitman had no business running HP. That said I admit I am biased against her because of the really really ill informed way she decided important technical issues.
Just in case people don't know how stupid Meg is, she (1) acquired Skype; (2) did not acquire Skype's p2p tech; (3) fucked the Skype founders on an earn out; (4) was apparently shocked when said founders declined to renew the licensing deal for the p2p tech.
What business ebay, an auctions company, had owning Skype was never explained.
There’s also the trade unionist Mick Lynch who, also appearing frequently in the UK news recently and being fairly similar in appearance, has caused me some brief moments of confusion.
Definitely a win for the UK tech scene and US/UK tech collaboration/M&A in general. Having met Mike and pitched to him on several occasions, it’s clear he’s a huge asset to the AI startup ecosystem here in the UK. Certainly feels like justice has been done in one of the worlds most epic cases of buyer remorse.
I mean.... I'm not sure how/why he was "cleared" considering it's well established the Autonomy engaged in significant accounting fraud to inflate its revenues. The CFO is still in prison over this.
