Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If it ever became a reliable option Nvidia would just send a cease and desist and then sue. It's a blind alley as a serious solution.

It makes sense in that context.




Why would software that lets me use hardware that I own, installed in my machine, be subject to a cease and desist?


because of the way the software you use, use other software that is licensed.

Just like it is not legal to do copyright infringement indifferent to how much you own the hardware you do it on.


> Just like it is not legal to do copyright infringement indifferent to how much you own the hardware you do it on.

It is legal for me to make a copy of any copyright protected media using hardware that I own. It is not legal for me to share this copy with others.

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thuiskopie


Emulator developers should incorporate in the Netherlands, it seems.


This is a LD_LIBRARY_PATH emulator. No CUDA installation required.


You probably still want to use things like cublas if you want to run existing CUDA software.


I would want an equivalent of cublas optimized for my specific GPU model and implementing the same API.

AFAIK cublas and other first-party libraries are hand-optimized by nVidia for different generations of their hardware, with dynamic dispatch in runtime for optimal performance. Pretty sure none of these versions would run optimally on AMD GPUs because ideally AMD GPUs run 64 threads / wavefront, nVidia GPUs run 32 threads / wavefront.


> Just like it is not legal to do copyright infringement indifferent to how much you own the hardware you do it on.

Sony Computer Entertainment v. Connectix Corp.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=716676913673727...

> The object code of a program may be copyrighted as expression, 17 U.S.C. § 102(a), but it also contains ideas and performs functions that are not entitled to copyright protection. See 17 U.S.C. § 102(b).

> Object code cannot, however, be read by humans.

> The unprotected ideas and functions of the code therefore are frequently undiscoverable in the absence of investigation and translation that may require copying the copyrighted material.

> We conclude that, under the facts of this case and our precedent, Connectix's intermediate copying and use of Sony's copyrighted BIOS was a fair use for the purpose of gaining access to the unprotected elements of Sony's software.


Welcome the the US when you can patent protocols and apis. (Afaik)

In EU you could have done it but because of US risks they killed it anyway.


If it is totally fine in the EU, why not just host it there? Spain (or whoever) could start up a cottage industry of ignore-local-ip-law-as-a-service. The Uber of IP law.


Because the US enforce their rules on world wide.

That's not legal but who's gonna stop them.


No, the US can't.

Also, Wine does the same since forever for DOS binaries. Or NetBSD with compat_* libreries for tons of Unixlike OSes.


The US uses trade agreements to enforce the rule in the EU. Spain used to be quite lenient with copyright, but the US threatened to block all sales to Spain of movies and music. Then a minister basically implemented new restrictions a week before their term was up.


It's still lenient. You can still legally share movies and music without profit.


Try selling cuban goods in Europe to another European citizens in Europe and let him pay with PayPal (Europe) S. à r.l. et Cie, S.C.A.


Spain does it fine with hotel chains. Maybe not Paypal, but for sure it does commerce with Cuba.


Yet I can download VLC


Nvidia can't copyright an API. Sure they can sue, but that would be a SLAPP.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: