Let's say you're at Tesla service and there are 100 cars parked there. You need to find the next one to service. This setting is for finding cars in a parking lot.
It has nothing to do with privacy.
I mean, it literally says what it is in the dialog that's posted.
If you take a self-parking/-summoning ride to a dealership service department where they shuffle cars every few minutes, it's reasonable to leave keys or their equivalent. If the equivalent is a geofenced, limited duration, remote control credential generated only by an owner-initiated positive control process, then that's fine too.
Tesla summon is a laughable party trick owners try once and then never use again out of embarrassment, fear or frustration. After dealing with disconnect issues, it driving slower than a Turtle, or a surprisingly close call.
Another half baked feature they threw into the wild and never came back around to doing anything useful with for years.
I've owned a Tesla for three years and I often use the summon feature to fix a sub-optimal parking job, scoot the car forward so I can use the trunk, or drive the car out of a puddle that has accumulated during a rain storm. In that time it has never had "disconnect issues", nor has it gotten close to hitting anything. My only gripe is that it's kinda slow.
And if you don't like the feature you can just... not use it. It's not like the Tesla app bugs you if you don't summon.
You are using "summon" which is the feature to move forward/back a few feet. This is not a groundbreaking or unique feature to only Tesla, and I'm sure it works fine for your narrow use case.
The feature I was ranting about was called "smart summon" and was vaporware.
Remember the car was going to navigate driving across a crowded Target parking lot to pick you up from the front in the rain? Still in beta 4 years later. Apparently doesn't even work on vision cars?
People used to talk about Jobs and his reality distortion field, but legal would Apple legal clearly had more sway than Tesla's, as Musks abuse of the English language and state of reality is orders of magnitude more absurd.
Such a tough problem. I can see why they need to have a specific app feature to solve this.
It’s incredible that literally every single other car manufacturer manages to do this without that feature. I mean, if only cars were legally required to display some sort of plate with a unique identifier on them.
They do it badly. I’ve waited multiple times for other dealerships to find my car or find my keys. One time they lost the keys because the mechanic had taken them home in his pocket.
I’ve had my Tesla looked at twice. The first time I took it in and told them I was here, they didn’t need the key or ask where it was parked. The second time they came to the house, I just walked to work and left it in an accessible place and they did the rest.
Obviously my anecdote doesn't trump your anecdote, but I've had 4 different cars (different brands each time) and a few motorcycles so far (all the same brand but w/e) and have had them serviced at multiple dealerships. In the UK you have to have an "MOT"[1] issued by a dealership every year after the vehicle is over a certain age. So in total I've probably had a vehicle serviced about 20 times across everything from top end fancy dealerships where they give you an espresso and an office to work in while you wait[2] to sketchy places where you feel you probably don't want to touch anything because you'll be covered with germs and/or grease. I've literally never had a problem with my keys or me or the dealer finding the vehicle before after or during.
Again: this just doesn't seem like a problem that even exists let alone is serious enough to warrant giving an entire organisation permanent unfettered access to my vehicle or its location.
Only had 2 newish cars where I’ve used the dealerships, previous cars I just used a local garage.
I’m UK based. Hyundai lost my key. Nissan were just generally useless all round and I’d have to wait ages for anything, including key retrieval.
The woman at Nissan argued with me when my car broke down that I wasn’t due a courtesy car. The RAC driver said I was and when I called the Nissan line they gave me one.
Upon picking my car up I scored the woman down on the feedback sheet. When she asked why I said it’s because she said I wasn’t due a courtesy car and I would have been hundreds out of pocket had I taken her word for it. She then proceeded to argue with me that I wasn’t due a courtesy car despite having had one for 2 weeks.
Pickup/dropoff is very easy too. A simple phone call before and we were able to just pull into the service lot and just leave. They will find it. Then during pickup we just went after hours and grabbed it from the lot. No dealing with anyone or keys or locked gates or anything.
Somehow every other car dealer in the world already has a solution to this problem and it doesn't involve the manufacturer having basically unrestricted root access to my car lmao.
GM has had the same type of root access to its cars since around 2009.
Police can use it to stop cars in high speed chases and it can be used to track stolen (behind on payments...) cars.
It has nothing to do with privacy.
I mean, it literally says what it is in the dialog that's posted.