>Not sure how being able to reason about good behaviour in an effective manner that's collectively beneficial isn't in the domain of intelligence.
That's neither here nor there.
Having the intelligence "to reason about good behaviour in an effective manner that's collectively beneficial" doesn't mean you're constrained to reason and act only on that, and not also able to reason and act on behavior which is beneficial to you to the detriment of others and the collective.
And it's pefectly intelligent to follow the latter if you can get away with it, and if the benefit for you is more than your share of the collective benefit alternatives would be.
>We have moral philosophy as an academic discipline, after all.
And how has that been working out for us?
(Not to mention, keyword: academic).
>Human brains develop in interrelation. Much, if not all of our intelligence gets developed in relation to other humans and beings.
Yes, and a lot of it is devoted to duping and getting the upper hand of those other humans and beings. So?
That's neither here nor there.
Having the intelligence "to reason about good behaviour in an effective manner that's collectively beneficial" doesn't mean you're constrained to reason and act only on that, and not also able to reason and act on behavior which is beneficial to you to the detriment of others and the collective.
And it's pefectly intelligent to follow the latter if you can get away with it, and if the benefit for you is more than your share of the collective benefit alternatives would be.
>We have moral philosophy as an academic discipline, after all.
And how has that been working out for us?
(Not to mention, keyword: academic).
>Human brains develop in interrelation. Much, if not all of our intelligence gets developed in relation to other humans and beings.
Yes, and a lot of it is devoted to duping and getting the upper hand of those other humans and beings. So?