On: AI isn’t good enough

[_xivi]

> nothing to back up this primary assertion.

Well, he's making a prediction, a speculation, a claim.

If it was as simple as `x->y` it would no longer be valuable.

[Philpax → _xivi]

Sure, but even then you're expected to back up your speculation. There doesn't seem to be anything within the article to support the claim that we're at the tail end of development; just assumptions that today's limitations will apply tomorrow.