On: A Tour of C++ (Third edition)

[pjmlp]

I am not the only one, this is a common discussion point on C++ communities.

Clang first should spend it's resources catching up with C++20, instead of spending them on C++23. The standard is yet to be fully finished.

[throwaway311022 → pjmlp]

Who exactly cares about C++20? Most (mis)features of the “standard” won’t be used for years anyway, until the codegen stabilizes and performance impact will be known. Most of people in these communities never got a dollar for a line of C++, and people who did rarely express their opinion (but you can still find it online if you try)

[snovv_crash → throwaway311022]

It seems pretty obvious to me that you never lived through the bad old days when compilers all did whatever they wanted.

Tell me again how much you care about C++20 when a library with a feature you want uses it but your toolchain doesn't support it.