> Photoshop doesn’t use AI models to generate new things for the artist, photographer, whoever
It certainly does have this, such as tools to remove objects and paint over them as if they were not there, automatic sky replacement (replace a cloudy sky with a sunset), super resolution (AI up scaling) and a range of what they call 'Neural Filters'.
You want your low quality boring midday image of some famous bridge to be a high resolution, taken during sunrise without that person riding a bicycle? Photoshop will do it with very little user skill or input.
Some beta features include style transfer, makeup transfer and automatic smile enhancment.
Yeah, but nobody is buying Photoshop for the inpainting features. Photoshop's bread-and-butter is raster graphics tools, and almost all of them function deterministically.
Not sure what you mean by "deterministically", but most models are deterministic during inference: given the same input or prompt, they'll generate the same output.
It certainly does have this, such as tools to remove objects and paint over them as if they were not there, automatic sky replacement (replace a cloudy sky with a sunset), super resolution (AI up scaling) and a range of what they call 'Neural Filters'.
You want your low quality boring midday image of some famous bridge to be a high resolution, taken during sunrise without that person riding a bicycle? Photoshop will do it with very little user skill or input.
Some beta features include style transfer, makeup transfer and automatic smile enhancment.