Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That doesn’t even make sense. Why go through the trouble of retargeting based on images? If you took a photo of something you likely already own it.



> If you took a photo of something you likely already own it.

Tell that to Amazon who never fail to recommend me things I just bought.


Hey if you really liked the vacuum cleaner you just bought, you definitely want to buy another one.


You have to believe that Amazon's algorithm is working as intended though, right?

The thesis is that recent vacuum cleaner purchasers are many times more likely (than the average person) to be looking to buy a vacuum cleaner.

Apparently about 20% of Amazon purchases are returned. And most returners are looking for a replacement. Some of the replacement product research is done before the return decision is made, so you get ads even if you have not initiated a return.

As much as Amazon doesn't want you to return your purchase, they really don't want you to buy the replacement somewhere else.

It would be interesting to measure how the ad ratio changes over time. Particularly when you exit the return window, but of course Amazon will know the return-likelihood curve with much greater precision.


Yes, for sure. Now I've got a different vacuum cleaner for every room. Never have I felt cleaner before.


Wait until you find out about whole home vacuums! Then you can turn The Whole House into a vacuum!


Looking through my photos, that's not the case. It's either things I don't own but like, places I enjoyed, or photos of things I want to buy / sent to my wife to buy. In my case, the photos would be a prefect targeting opportunity.


Mindlessly retargeting you based on things you own or have already bought is standard practice in the online ad industry.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: