Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Okay, now how much carbon does the entire gas infrastructure used to pipe that gas around emit, and the gas used to heat homes? Because as long as people are going to specifically demand gas stoves, all that infrastructure still has to exist, and gas heating is going to be attractive because the gas hookup is already there.

The fossil fuel industry specifically uses gas stoves as a gateway to push people towards using more gas (see the old “cooking with gas” campaign for example). This is about countering that messaging.

(And besides, we know more about the health impacts of gas stove use now too; there are more direct health reasons you’d want to avoid them in addition to the climate impacts.)

https://www.npr.org/2021/10/07/1015460605/gas-stove-emission...




We already have the infrastructure and it works great. How about solve the planes and container ships then we can work our way down to the things that barely matter?


> The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that in 2019, methane emissions from natural gas and petroleum systems and from abandoned oil and natural gas wells were the source of about 29% of total U.S. methane emissions and about 3% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.

Source: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/natural-gas-...

Sounds like it matters to me, especially considering methane is a particularly potent greenhouse gas.


> things that barely matter

Can you support the claim that they barely matter? From what I've seen, consumers produce a significant amount of GHG.

Why not solve both now? There's no reason to wait for someone else to do something, and many solutions take time to develop and implement.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: