On: Update on Hiring Plans

[andy81]

N=3 is an absurd sample size to base hiring or investment decisions on, especially considering that each halving will have a smaller effect than the previous.

[Mistletoe → andy81]

And yet here we are, in another bear year right on schedule...

https://www.lookintobitcoin.com/charts/bitcoin-investor-tool...

[mentalpiracy → andy81]

N=3 is an absurd sample size when you are sampling from an otherwise large pool.

When N=3 because that's the entire size of the sampling pool, failing to take heed of those patterns is an unforced error.

[wbsss4412 → andy81]

It’s better than making an assumption that runs completely contrary to the he limited actual data that you do have.