Just like the majority of things in life, moderation is the important part. I was diagnosed with ADHD as a teen, and took adderall to deal with it and get through school. In my 30s, I continue with taking it in reasonable doses, with breaks occasionally. It helps me focus when I want, and I have no known side effects except for a lack of appetite after taking it. 10mg still gives me the same effect as it did when I was a kid. Amphetamines are useful when applied correctly in the correct dosages. Like the majority of drugs out there. Step aside doctors, let the pharmacists do their jobs.
I suspect everyone just performs better on amphetamines adhd or not. This was basically what erdos argued too iirc.
I’ve been curious about it since I’ve never tried it but many people I know have. I’d be curious how much better I would be able to focus/think with it.
Speed certainly helps everyone become more productive ADHD or not, but it doesn't actually make you smarter (at least in my exp). Also the side-effects of regular use were too severe for me to keep taking it.
But damn the first time in college I took a 20mg and it was like a whole new world opened up for me: I felt super-human and the amount of work I was able to churn out was incredible. But like all things, it eventually catches up to you and you turn into a cracked out zombie whos muscles hurt and can't sleep.
Significantly. Though I'd argue you could come close or match it with sufficient willpower and conditioning your mind. It's just easy mode. I will say coming down off of it is twice as bad as the boost you gain from using it. Not worth it for that reason alone.
The only reason I'm not taking it are reports from the users I know. The recurring theme is "soon you are unable to get up in the morning without your dose of speed".
I have ADHD, when I take my Adderall I feel like I am a normal person. However if I take a break for the next 3-4 days it is like having a major depressive episode, super tired, no interest in anything, and a ravenous hunger.
I started meds for ADHD just under a year ago, and it was the most profound experience of my life. Until I started and experienced my brain fog lifting for the first time in my life, my mind and body physically relaxing an becoming quieter, I had no concept of how off my perception of normal was.
The explanation of how stimulants affect the brain, by increasing the amount of norepinephrine and dopamine and inhibiting re-uptake, is something I feel I understand now.
When I read the experiences of those with and without ADHD taking stimulants they’re pretty consistent. Those without take some, are in a ”high” get a load of stuff done, then crash hard. If they take it for too long, their normal starts to sound closer to the normal I experienced before taking medication.
I kind of agree with you in the sense of having a bad classification of normal, I did. The cause and treatment are some of the most well studied areas of psychology, and stimulant treatment is one of the most effective in all of psychology.
ADHD, aside from being incredibly poorly named, is looking more and more like something we will come to know as a collection of related but different conditions, that happen to all respond well to stimulant medication.
I’d also add, stimulants don’t solve ADHD. They’re not a cure, they’re at best a pair of glasses, a crutch for someone with a broken leg, or a wheelchair for someone with mobility issues. They can help a lot, but they’re only one part of living with ADHD.
Yeah - this kind of thing makes me think I might benefit from it. I get a very positive response to coffee (reducing anxiety, helps reduce compulsive tics, increased focus).
My skepticism is that I suspect everyone shares the benefits you describe when they take the meds. Maybe I'm wrong about that, but I haven't really seen compelling evidence otherwise (people will just state it affects non-adhd people differently, but that doesn't seem to be the case imo).
> ADHD, aside from being incredibly poorly named, is looking more and more like something we will come to know as a collection of related but different conditions, that happen to all respond well to stimulant medication.
Not all ADHD responds well to stimulant medication, so not even that.
It's certainly addictive, but it's overblown imo. Like if you stop taking it after regular use you'll feel tired and have an adjustment period for a week or two, but it's not like it's gonna ruin you forever.
You’re not generally wrong but I think it’s worth keeping in mind that this is going to depend on a combination of all sorts of factors in your personal health profile and the dosage you’ve been taking.
It’s not just the addiction that is problematic. It’s the long-term consequences of the chronic side effects. We all know you need to sleep and to eat. This medication makes it harder to do both of those activities if not managed properly and thoroughly. Combine a failure to do that with long-term usage (abuse) and you've got a recipe for permanent damage on your hands that can cyclically reinforce that dependence.
Here’s an anecdote. I did a group project with a guy in college who I got to talking with about it. He had one of these nightmare stories. He said he had to stop taking it because he was absolutely strung out. I asked him about his dosage and he told me he had been taking 80mg XR/day. I was unaware they even made dosages that high. He said that he didn’t realize it at the time but he just kept chasing the initial feeling (seems he didn’t understand the concept of tolerance), and his doctor responded by repeatedly titrating up his dosage. He was at that max dosage for about a year and a half. He said when he stopped he went through a months long phase of extreme depression and physical discomfort like he has never experienced in his life before. He shared some pretty brutal stuff with me. He said that it had been a year and he still didn’t feel like his old self. He said it was like his attention span was even shorter than before the medication and at this point he wasn’t sure if it would ever be the same.
It’s difficult because the minimum effective dose is quite subjective. My doctor even suggested my continuing to increase my dose without prompting, but I’ve paused at 15.
The pitfalls are real but personally, being 3-4 months in, it’s been such a game changer in my temperament and quality of life.
I mean, have you tried quitting coffee? I was drinking a cup a day for years, and going to zero meant being in a depressed unproductive funk for 10 days.
I have an easier time not taking my amphetamine pill than I ever did skipping my morning coffee.
> have you tried quitting coffee? I was drinking a cup a day for years, and going to zero meant being in a depressed unproductive funk for 10 days.
I've found supplementing w/lions mane largely mitigates caffeine withdrawal symptoms. It also takes the edge off when taking high caffeine doses. It's kind of like a caffeine antidote. I used to abstain from it for decades because of these negatives. Now it's a quite useful, legal, and cheap stimulant I'll go on /heavily/ and off at will.
This was me for a while in my early 20s... In retrospect it was similar to that sign you'll see in some old coffee shops: "Drink coffee! Do stupid things faster and with more energy!"
this effect has been documented for a long time. I dont want the long term health effects and life destruction so I stick to coffee and take the productivity hit in the short term.
Meh, after having seen how my unmedicated self turned out, depressed, anxious, isolated and chronically unsatisfied with their life, getting an ADHD diagnosis and stimulant medication means I can slightly stress my body in exchange for a meaningful life. Fuck yes.
And from what I can see in the research, therapeutic doses of amphetamines do not damage the body by any meaningful level, while untreated ADHD may shorten life expectancy by 10 to 20 years.
It makes me curious though - I'm doing fine now, but could it help me do something truly great? Are most people doing truly great things on adderall? It'd be interesting to know.
I had to stop reading the article. Even if it might have some redeeming content further on, the title and first few paragraphs are preposterous.
I got an ADHD diagnosis as an adult, albeit before the pandemic. The diagnosis itself has been a huge revelation about many aspects of my life, my mind, several things I would never have understood as connected… and it saved my life.
I’m not “hooked” on adderall—at least not in the sense of a drug seeking addict. Nor am I “crazy”. I’m fucking chemically imbalanced. And no one who isn’t is going to feel calmed or feel their anxiety relieved by amphetamines.
I have a hard time reading this “correction” as intended in good faith, you would have to have misread every aspect of what you’re responding to. But I’ll respond in good faith because it’s important to me that people are not misled on this, intentionally or otherwise.
First of all, I did not mean ‘no one who isn’t(crazy)’, I meant no one who is not chemically imbalanced such that they will benefit from an amphetamine prescription.
Second of all, none of my comment had anything to do with the benefits for focus or racing thoughts. When I mentioned feeling calmed and anxiety relief, those were speaking to the same benefit for ADHD patients. Amphetamines are stimulants. Heightened energy and anxiety are generally their most common side effects, just as with caffeine. People with ADHD typically (but not always) experience the opposite effect, at least up to their optimal dosage.
More to the point, and I hope this will help clarify the overall scope of my comment: ADHD—despite the name, reputation, and many diagnostic criteria—is far more than either a deficit of attention or hyperactivity. When I say my diagnosis and treatment saved my life, I mean from the effects of traumatically crippling anxiety.
I had never even wondered if I had the stereotypical ADHD symptoms. I had to work with my psychiatrists to translate the diagnostic criteria into relevant experiences with intense sensory overload, hyperfocus/hyperfixation, anxiety and depression, social problems. If it weren’t for me making the connection to sensory overload, I never would have even had the conversation with a doctor in the first place. I’d be trying—and likely failing—to find the right combination of SSRI and benzo.
This is a very common story for a lot of people diagnosed with ADHD as adults, mine just happened to be fairly extreme because I was drinking myself to death to self medicate the anxiety. Which… self medicating is another common outcome for undiagnosed adults.
Anyway. All of that is to say, you’re not wrong that amphetamines tend to have a similar effect on focus for most people, at least to a point. But lacking “focus” in that productivity sense is really more of a clue than a primary symptom of ADHD.
This misunderstanding is mostly rooted in the diagnostic criteria being oriented around adult descriptions of children’s behavior. Not the actual patient’s experience in their own words.
If you ask people diagnosed as adults, or even children who haven’t internally stigmatized their own experiences, what ADHD is like… it often more closely lines up with a lot of experiences expressed by a lot of people with autism. And it’s not that trouble focusing is a complete red herring, it’s that why we have trouble focusing isn’t a part of the discussion.
So yeah. People abuse Adderall to focus. Common trope, no argument here. Those people abusing it, unless they’re unaware they’re undiagnosed, generally feel like they’ve taken an upper. Because they have! People with ADHD often feel the opposite even at an optimal dose, and generally should expect to be able to sleep while it’s still active and noticeably effective. Many of us even get sleepy especially on lower doses. I spent months while I was stepping up in dosage where I would need a nap about an hour after taking my morning meds. That is not how people react without the chemical imbalance Adderall treats.
Wow. You’re really just an asshole. Fuck directly off please.
Edit for the benefit of people who are not assholes and may want to know about how ADHD treatment works chemically:
> I don't think adderall or any amphetamine is a permanent working solution for adhd. It just works. It's the same as taking painkillers for pain. Is the source of the pain gone? No. Will it work forever? No. Does it work? Somewhat.
This is all correct in my experience. If the person commenting had left it there I would have emphatically agreed and moved on. Probably with quite a bit more to say supporting this. I’m happy to fill more in later if anyone wants.
> Will a person with ADHD have more focus? Yes, just like any other person will.
This is both questionably true and intentionally ignoring what it’s responding to in obvious bad faith. For what it’s worth, my ability to focus on amphetamines is roughly the same as it was before I ever got diagnosed. For reasons that are true in the first quote I agreed with emphatically.
> It's not a permanent solution.
On this I just wholeheartedly agree. No notes at all. Treating ADHD is maintenance, not a cure. I don’t even know that I’d want a cure.
> On the topic of drug seeking behaviour, that's exactly what your post sounds like. You're instantly defensive, you begin arguing points that it seems only exist in your mind, anything to protect and validate "your next dose.
I’m sorry to tell anyone seeking information about ADHD diagnosis or treatment, but you’re inevitably going to encounter people who think this way no matter what your experience. If you feel like their description of your reaction doesn’t match your reality, it very probably doesn’t. People are understandably biased about amphetamines, and probably see confirmations of their concerns where they don’t realize it’s not true.
> The problem is discipline and focus is HARD.. amphetamines make it easy. It's scary to admit it, but once you tell yourself it's hard it will become easier.
This is just common ADHD dismissal. It’s completely ignoring actual ADHD experiences and challenges. It’s completely disregarding symptoms as expressed by actual people with ADHD. And it’s entirely focused on “focus”, which has nothing to do with what I described in any of my responses.
I’m posting this in hopes anyone who might have a similar background to mine might not be dissuaded by this kind of ignorant judgment.
Not sure how you can consider yourself a victim in the right with this sort of tone. Regardless I won't be wasting anymore of my time on this conversation. It may be beneficial to take a look at this conversation at some point when you have a calmer mind(perhaps after you have taken your medication if that's what it takes.)
I think people get too hung up on deciding who “really has” ADHD. It’s not a super meaningful exercise.
There is no clean, black and white line demarcating ADHD from normal. A huge percentage of the population, if not a majority, experiences increased focus and motivation when taking stimulants.
We’re all just trying to make the best of what we’ve got. If the benefits outweigh the risks, there’s not much sense in trying formalize a “fair/not fair” level of focus and motivation.
A freelancing client, wanting me to work faster, offered me Adderall. Needless to say things soured quickly (that wasn't the only reason) and I gave them all their money back.
Buried amidst the sensationalism of people "popping pills" at the behest of their psychiatrists is the real lede:
> [...] the Drug Enforcement Administration decides how much can be sold for the entire country. And the DEA has dropped its allowed quotas. In 2016, it allowed 50,000 kilograms to be sold; but for 2022, it has lowered the amount to 41,200 kilograms. [...] All of which is leading some people to buy illegal Adderall, which goes by the street name of “Adderall.” [...] Some wind up with fentanyl-laced Adderall.
This is unconscionable. These shortages inflict tremendous anxiety upon those who rely on amphetamines to treat their ADHD. As anyone who is prescribed amphetamines can confirm: effective treatment is very sensitive to dosage, and unplanned pauses in treatment Really Suck.
A few months ago, my local CVS told me to either transfer my prescription, or come back the following month — they had reached their procurement quota. Last month, it took me two weeks to get to the front of their wait-list and get my prescription filled.
What choices does this leave patients who are unable to easily get to other pharmacies? At best, they're compelled to override the judgement of their care providers and either ration or entirely skip doses. At worst (or so this article claims) it pushes patients onto the black market.
A quick google search suggests that amphetamine shortages stretch back years. I feel immensely lucky to have lived in unaffected locales up until recently, and I feel immense anxiety to discover that my present locale is plagued by shortages with no end in sight.
> Before the pandemic, America was already gobbling up 83.1 percent of the global supply. But in December 2020, prescriptions for Adderall skyrocketed.
So it was high before, but now even became higher? Something tells me when 1 country accounts for more than 80%, there is already something going very, very wrong. This has nothing to do with ADHD, this is a culture problem.
Is it wrong? I don't think anyone is up in arms over coffee and cigarettes, and my personal experience is that Adderall is just caffeine without so many side-effects.
Incidentally, coffee and cigarettes is how I managed before getting a prescription.
Amphetamines don't effect people with ADHD the same way as it effects people without ADHD.
By improving the executive function of an ADHD person, it helps them be less impulsive and can definitely help sort out any comorbid anxiety they experience.
What I'm saying is if this is your experience on Adderall and you don't have an ADHD diagnosis, you may be self medicating without realizing it.
In university I ran into a lot of people who did this stuff to get grades. Many straight up acted like tweakers. Super fast speech, tiny pupils, twitchy, sweaty, etc. I didn't realize it was so popular until like 30% of my classmates would be like this during exams.
Exactly, I can spot it immediately in the way they talk. You have to experienced it yourself before you be able to notice it with others. After I had a night full of amphetamines, the world opened up
This number doesn't seem to account for other countries (e.g. most of Europe) prescribing similar enough drugs - e.g. Ritalin for the same reason much more than Adderall.
America has had a stimulant drug friendly culture for the last hundred years. Benzedrine from the 1930s to the late 1960s. Cocaine in the 70s and 80s. Ritalin, Dexedrine, Adderall, and clandestinely produced methamphetamine from the 1990s to now. Caffeine and nicotine.
You can use an online service to get these these days. I think if we roll back COVID online prescription allowances it’ll be an interesting lock-in mechanism for current users.
Big fan of easing access to pharma without standard gatekeeping.
Yeah it’s kinda a weird situation where we moralize stimulants and only prescribe them to people when it’s medically necessary despite it actually being safe for basically everyone when monitored by your doctor. Like this gatekeeping makes is an absolute PITA for me because I do have ADHD and have to jump through so many hoops just to maintain my prescription because the war on drugs or something.
Like we don’t make some guy prove that their ED is debilitating and get psychologists notes and make them get blood tests constantly to make sure they’re taking it to get viagra, the only standard is “can you take it without messing up your health.”
If you made this stuff accessible to anyone who wants it there would suddenly be no reason to worry that ADHD patients are selling it on the side.
Stimulants, especially crack cocaine, caused loads of crime in the 80s. I mean, it even does today - addicts crush and snort Adderall all the time for the high.
It's the 5% of the population with addictive personalities that ruins it for everyone else.
Intriguingly, ADHD is correlated with crime as well. Some studies would estimate that it's 4-10x (or more) as prevalent in prison populations as in the general population.[1][2]
We could conclude that a lot of people are self-medicating without realizing it.
There's also a significant reduction in crime rate and drug use in people with adhd that are being properly treated. I'll let interested parties do their own research.
The only reason it "caused crime" was because the drugs were illegal. Most of the negative effects of criminal drug use are the criminal aspect, not the abuse aspect. Alcoholism is terrible, but, banning alcohol made the problems much much worse, and affect many more people, and resulted in an infamous amount of organized crime. That's where drugs are today. When you could get cocaine over the counter, and opium on the street corner, the addicts needed help, but it harmed society as a whole less -- and banning the substances did not reduce the number of addicts, simply interfered with their ability to get help.
>banning alcohol made the problems much much worse
The difference with drugs today is that a lot of them can easily kill you or create a physical dependency after the first use. Alcohol won't do that unless you're just chugging Everclear and trying to hurt yourself.
It makes no sense to have a ban on marijuana or magic mushrooms, but crap like Fentanyl and NBOMe should be illegal. They have zero potential to help and are almost certain to harm.
Giving people Fentanyl for pain management is almost as bad as bloodletting to cure a respiratory illness. It's a very dangerous substance, even in moderation. It needs to go the way of leaded gasoline for the sake of public safety.
The issue is not just overdoses. It's long term physical and psychological dependencies that drive people there to begin with. A lot of addicts become addicted through prescriptions, and then they doctor shop. And in some cases it has even come out that doctors received kickbacks from the pharma companies.
I'm 100% in favor of banning synthetic heroin pills. They shouldn't exist.
The limitations of this theory are playing out in the Bay Area (where enforcement is so lax drugs are in effect decriminalized) in real time. There are absolutely large negative externalities from drug addiction, independent of the enforcement regime.
Lax enforcement is not the same thing as decriminalization -- and decriminalization in a small area is not the same as legalization. If the import to that area is still under control, then you're still going to have the smuggling problems and all of its attendant apparatus, the drug concentration problems (small items are easier to smuggle, so more potent drugs are smuggled more often), the purity problems, and so on. And increasing enforcement does not actually reduce the number of addicts, it simply moves these addicts to prison, which is worse for not only the addict, but now for society that must pay for their sentence. Forty years of drug enforcement has not stopped the drug trade. Should we give it another forty, or try something else?
Because of the ignorance and paranoia of some people I have to source 4F-MPH from shady sources in order to self-medicate my ADHD. Thankfully I can get my work done now but I wish I could just get it safely from the pharmacy.
I'm told that microdosing Adderall isn't a bad idea-- just take between 5 and 20 of the little balls in there. Amphetamine's effects are super non linear, and this cuts the side effects.
I’ve been taking it for the better part of 20 years - dabbling in various dosages of XR and Ritalin in an attempt to nail down an optimal therapeutic dose - and my conclusion has been that (for me) nothing works nearly as well as frequent microdosing of IR.
As an aside: One aspect of Adderall that doesn’t get nearly enough attention outside forums/subreddits is that the generics seem to have wildly different effects/potency depending on the manufacturer. I highly recommend others with ADHD that are prescribed to Adderall IR try to experiment switching around generics if possible.
This is a good time to mention some things that should be more common knowledge:
-Recreational use of prescription meds makes it vastly more difficult for people who actually need them. Especially when their condition causes an inability to schedule and coordinate.
-Psychiatrically, recent studies are showing that neurotypical brains don't actually benefit much from stimulant medications (but the illusion of productivity can be a good placebo)
> It’s so weird. I’m not seeing that people are having a hard time getting benzos at CVS
Probably because benzos are schedule IV, where as adderall is schedule II -- it's much more tightly controlled.
> “Kids were staying home without a routine. It was easier to call a pediatrician and say, ‘Joey can’t focus on the computer with remote learning. Can you help?’ ”
And the pediatrician would refer to a clinical psychologist to do a thorough evaluation, including looking at things like report cards, statements from parents about behavior, and quasi-empirical tests to gauge attention span.
> Adderall is prescribed for ADHD, which was once diagnosed only in the prepubescent. Now adults are discovering they have ADHD. Or occasional ADHD. Or work-at-home ADHD.
...No, people are getting diagnosed with adhd. as far as I'm aware, diagnosis as an adult still requires that there was a manifestation before age 12, but adults need fewer criteria to meet a diagnosis.
They're not discovering that they have adhd, they're being diagnosed with adhd by qualified professionals.
This is drivel.
> “If you were normally going to an office in a structured environment and now you’re working from home and have to focus, you’ve got a reason to be taking it,” says Lotano-Saba
Lotano-Saba, a "vice president of pharmacy solutions at the global management consulting firm AArete", which is not a position granted with the trust to determine who meets diagnostic critera.
> And if you’re also dealing with bored kids interrupting your Slack chats and Zoom meetings, you’ve got even more reason to seek a potion to help you focus.
Yes, medicate the children so that you can focus. Don't think about their well being at all. (/s)
> The only reason Ginsberg doesn’t have pills in her medicine cabinet anymore is that it got too expensive. Adderall, especially in this new shortage, is the Domaine du Romanée-Conti of prescription medication. Not only do you have to shell out for whatever your insurance doesn’t cover, but you also have to pay for a session with a psychiatrist every three months to get a new prescription
Yes, healthcare in America is too expensive, and the cost of adderall is prohibitive to some people that might clinically benefit from it. It's quite unfortunate. And no, you don't need to see a psychiatrist every three months. Some GPs will prescribe after having a diagnosis by a clinical phsycologist.
A psychiatrist specializing in adhd will better be able to help determine the best dosage, which specific medications might be beneficial based on observed side effects -- people react to focalin, ritalin, adderall, vyvanse, and others quite differently. The drugs also all vary in cost and how they'll be covered by insurance.
> So Adderall has become a privilege of the L.A. elite.
Yes, people abuse adderall, and it's made it more difficult for people that need it to live a healthy life.
> Also, maybe, like inflation or something.
This is surely a well researched article...
> When I told a psychiatrist that I was late with this article and was thinking about trying Adderall to help me finish, he said incredulously, “You’ve never done Adderall?!” When I asked if I should lose my Adderall virginity, the respected psychiatrist paused and said, “Off the record? Definitely.”
So the author saw an unprofessional psychiatrist?
--- end of reading ---
Look...It's just a drug. How many people are on antidepressants? You can't just stop taking those at the drop of a hat without a major depressive episode. Yes, taking too much adderall is bad. Taking too many antidepressants is also bad. Drinking too much alcohol is bad.
Stigmatizing the drug, and the people that are impacted by a neuro-developmental disorder isn't doing any good for anyone.
Aaand my executive functioning capacity has been used up, fuck this noise.
That is not what ADHD is... ADHD is not lack of focus, it's lack of control over focus. It's issues with regulating emotion. Issues with impulsiveness. etc.
Trying to be charitable I think what they mean to say is “people with medically untreated ADHD who have been managing their symptoms with structure and routine finding their strategies failing in a new environment they have less control over.”
Given the context, it also might be a sarcastic illustration of people's misunderstanding of ADHD as a sporadic condition instead of a neurological disorder.
If you want performance enhancing drugs, just admit it, and we can move to having it over the counter.
I personally don't feel a need to take dangerous performance enhancing drugs, but I respect the rights of adults to make their choices. Legalize everything for those 21 or older.
> … just admit it, and we can move to having it over the counter.
Literally the worst strategy. There is one successful drug deregulation strategy in America: publish nonsense studies pointing at good healthcare outcomes then use that to wedge the drug into legality.
“Just admitting it” would lead to a ban on it. Literally would be the dumbest thing to do.
It's not mentally performance-enhancing in any significant way if don't have ADHD. If you have a "normal" brain, you get a psychological illusion of increased productivity.
As long as you're at least 21, you should have a right to put whatever you want in your body. The current system locks these performance enhancing drugs behind extremely expensive medical appointments.
Slap a warning label on it, like we slap a warning label on cigarettes and alcohol, and let adults do what they want.
Of course you can still have a doctor suggest you take these dangerous stimulants, like you can have a doctor suggest you get more exercise, or suggest that you cut back down on your alcohol consumption.
If the test of who has ADHD is checking who is more productive and focused after they take stimulants… then a very, very large percent of the population would quality.
>New research finds ADHD medications like Adderall don’t improve cognition in healthy college students and may even impair the memory of those who abuse the drugs.
...
>But how do these drugs respond differently to the brains of people with and without ADHD? Weyandt said that she believes the human brain might need to be at a deficit of some kind for drugs like these to work. If not, they could have a detrimental effect.
>She said that neuroimaging research with people who have ADHD has found reduced activity — think blood flow — in parts of the brain associated with the condition’s symptoms when off medication.
>Once given the proper medication, the activity increases in these regions of the brain, and ADHD symptoms go down. So a person with ADHD has an improved ability to pay attention, and shows improved memory, planning, and response inhibition, she said.
>“Since we found the drug did not improve neurocognition and may negatively influence working memory, this may suggest a deficit is needed to benefit from the medication,” she added. “Furthermore, we have found in other studies that students who report significant ADHD symptoms are more likely to misuse stimulants.”
The test for ADHD, at least in Uk, is figuring out how much your life has been impacted by your executive function disorder. Whether your anxiety and depression are a result of being chronically unable to direct your mind to your goals. If that's the case, you might have ADHD.
It's not a productivity test. It's a disability test.
The withdrawal period for opiates is about the same. Its the same for many substances, this does not matter in the eyes of the war on drugs people. That's not why drugs are controlled
i can provide a comparison of sorts . cigs are harder to quit than adderall but caffiene is easier to quit than adderall . obviously im talking about prescribed doses.
Methamphetamine isn't addictive? I realize that the war on drugs really skews perspectives, so maybe I'm way out of touch, but I'm _pretty_ sure it is extremely addictive. Can you provide some citations please?
My dad used to take non-prescription meth during his student days for better focus (this was way before Adderall). He did not have any addiction problem with it and used it only as a performance enhancer, like before exams. He could and did discontinue at will.
Our family life was and is as normal and balanced as it gets. He turned out to be a decorated scientist. He is in his 80s now and has no known health issues related to meth.
Just an anecdote, but there it is. I suspect much of the harm caused by meth is not by the meth itself but the impurities and contaminants that result from synthesizing them at under-equipped (both in terms of know-how and physical equipment) home labs.
