Corrections: My above post was written in response to the unedited version of the GP post, which stated the 5:1 ratio was vaccinated:unvaccinated (and implied it was based on total numbers). Apparently, since I posted it was edited (and corrected) to say it was 5:1 ratio of unvaccinated to vaccinated (and based on per capita.) This makes far more sense and also makes my reply look insane.
I take GP at their word that there were just errors in writing their post. But it does leave a weird artifact out there that I cannot fix.
I take GP at their word that there were just errors in writing their post. But it does leave a weird artifact out there that I cannot fix.