It sounds like you’re saying that ethical/moral responsibility does not exist outside of what’s required by law in any given jurisdiction and the only venue for change is lobbying legislators? That it’s OK to do anything imaginable as long as it’s not explicitly prohibited by law?
I am saying hijacking a comment on decision making to leverage a tragedy in order to make some thoughtless “amazon bad” claim is kinda weird.
There is no right to your phone at work. Should there be? I dunno, probably not, but if you feel there should be then vote for it.
Did Amazon do “the right thing” I dunno but that reply isn’t bringing any clarity to that discussion either.
I agree we should have moral/ethical duties. Unfortunately society has degraded to moral relativism mixed with tribal absolutism. So what that would even mean these days is fraught
If so I hope you reconsider one day.