We might not like everything our partners do, but there's a reason we have a basis of trust with them and not with clearly adversarial and malicious entities.
There is hard proof that both Belgium and Germany had various networks/major telcos compromised. And I would not be at all surprised if there were others.
Of course they're interested in my welfare; even a pawn has value to the state. Moreover, the five eyes are all representative democracies; China is not.
A pawn has value to the state as a tool. One such example is to be used as cannon fodder.
The US democracy is fake. Entrenched interests hold
virtually all power.
You have 6 trillion dollars and thousands of lives lost over fake wars. Where are those WMDs? Why didn't we pull out after getting bin Laden in Pakistan?
Go back a generation to the Vietnam War. 50k American lives lost.
History keeps on repeating itself and people are oblivious.
Even tools have value; better to be a tool of the state than an obstacle of an adversary.
I'm not American, and I'm rather proud that my elected representatives voted against joining the USA in the Iraq invasion. Americans voted for the Iraq invasion. It was popular[0]. It still remains reasonably popular, with slightly more Americans opposing it than supporting it in 2018[1]. Despite two decades of expenditure, pain and suffering.
"A superglue story also jacks up the Us > Them values. The story needs to be all about good guys and bad guys, with a crisp, clear distinction between the two. The good guys must be good in every way—in knowledge, talent, motivation, and virtue. They’re good now, they were always good in the past, and they’ll continue to be good in the future. The bad guys are the opposite—they are and always have been stupid, ignorant, malicious, and morally backwards. Strife between the good guys and bad guys is always the fault of the bad guys"
There's nothing shocking about that many representatives voting in favor of something that had over two thirds public support. In fact, it looks appropriate.
As for the media, the foreign and public press weren't so in favor. But I'll be the last to suggest that American media isn't terrible. It is.
And all the protests accomplished jackshit. Can't you see that that is the point? Your opinion and protests have no effect. Your protests are just plausible deniability.
The protests failed to invigorate change, not unlike anti mask protests today, because the message wasn't persuasive enough to sufficiently many people.
That's democracy. It's not great, but it's better than the alternatives.
We might not like everything our partners do, but there's a reason we have a basis of trust with them and not with clearly adversarial and malicious entities.