Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You are setting up the experiment as if we took one guy and decided to follow him for 6 years to see if he could beat the market.

Instead a reporter found one out of a couple of million investors who did well the last 6 years and decided to interview him.

I don't see why you feel talking about survivorship bias is unsound in this case.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: