Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I always find stories like this fascinating. It always reminds me of how fragile our futures are. If Google was acquired the internet will be a VERY different place today. I find it humourous because this kinda brings to mind Skynet from the Terminator. In the movies, they spend a lot of time sending killing machines to the past to take out people who would invent the future and it causes a great deal of chaos, while all they might need to do is add a clause in a merger or acquisition that botches a deal that prevents Skynet from existing and the mission is accomplished. LOL



Are you sure? If Google didn't remain Google within Excite, perhaps they wouldn't have been as successful, and would've still been replaced by the next Google-like company.

Perhaps, like judgement day, Google was inevitable.


Some of google's success was due to simple business decisions. An acquirer would reverse these, and google wouldn't win.

These were: uncluttered search-only, instead of a portal filled with junk; no paid-placement; it was also faster due to clever backend, so an acquirer could save money on the backend, bringing it down to adequate speed.

Some argue that The Algorithm (pagerank) wasn't important for google's success at all, except as marketing to geeks, because search results were comparable to alternatives.

Today, apart from consumer habit, google's biggest advantage is speed, possible by massive capital investment in datacenters.

But also today, google is hamstrung by money (Wall St), making them vulnerable, as previous search was.

OTOH the problem/need was there, maybe eventually there would have been another google targetting search-only.


> because search results were comparable to alternatives.

As an early user of Google I vehemently disagree. That better results was not due to PageRank alone is well understood.


I was an early user of Google too, and I don't remember the search results being any better than AltaVista (the dominant search engine at the time) or any of its other competitors.

Google was just fast and ad-free, unlike AltaVista, which was ad-infested and slow. That was the attraction for myself and the other people I knew who used it.


Perhaps we used to search for different things. AltaVista allowed far more control over operators and filters, but invariably I would have to dig much deeper in ther results to find what I was looking for. On google it would be there on the first page.


One of the things that struck me in the interview is that they conpared Excite with Google on top quieries.

Getting the top quieries right is relatively easy by hand, the real question is how the engines performed on random queries.


Instead of killing machines, the terminators would be lawyers. That could be a very interesting plot.

"Are you Sarah Connor? ... You've been served."


In The Sarah Connor Chronicles, one Terminator accidentally time traveled decades too far into the past, its arrival tweaking the timeline such that the person it was supposed to assassinate wouldn't be at the venue he was supposed to be. The terminator became a businessman and built a construction company, just to build the building where the assassination was to take place. According to records found, it was loved by its workers, since it cared more about getting the job done than about profits, and would regularly work alongside them.

So yeah, the idea doesn't need a lot of tweaking for a lawyer terminator to exist. They already do whatever they need to for their goal, they aren't just killing machines.


I'm sure this was part of the original intention of whoever named them "Terminators".


> That could be a very interesting plot.

No, it would involve lawyers.


Terminator lawyers!


Litigator 2: Judgement Day


My Cousin Vinny would have looked a lot different if Joe Pesci's character was a terminator.


I suspect that it is easier to terminate someone than to send someone back to become a lawyer to get situated in the right deals etc.

"Mission failed!"

"What happened?"

"Terminator 7 was not a good cultural fit at Akin Gump."

"Okay, roll out Terminator 8, but this time make sure he isn't quite as serious. Send him back..."


Realistically, killer machines wouldn't abide by the Geneva Convention and could just make up a poison gas or supervirus and wipe out all humanity without making humanoid robots in the first place.


Please be reading the parent comment, O creator of Robot Chicken!


[wrong parent]


Oh really, you "confirmed" search results were "comparable," do tell...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: