Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Why not quote the sentence before that?

Because however many hours were spent making it is irrelevant as to why it was made, which was the point.




I don't mean the hours, I mean the "cut-down version of".


Similar reason. Explaining how it was made (by cutting it dow) has no bearing on the why, which was the point.


No it wasn't, you were replying to:

> Is the author summarising his own impressions of Sapiens (surely acceptable), or literally lifting the original text of the book and taking it as his own [...]?

The first sentence about cutting it down answers that.


> No it wasn't, you were replying to

No, I was not, I was replying to the section I quoted (hence quoting it, that’s how that works).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: