Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Similar reason. Explaining how it was made (by cutting it dow) has no bearing on the why, which was the point.



No it wasn't, you were replying to:

> Is the author summarising his own impressions of Sapiens (surely acceptable), or literally lifting the original text of the book and taking it as his own [...]?

The first sentence about cutting it down answers that.


> No it wasn't, you were replying to

No, I was not, I was replying to the section I quoted (hence quoting it, that’s how that works).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: