> Quite frankly, I was a bit surprised so much of the discussion has been about LISP features that are neither in dispute nor subject of the article.
It's because Lisp macros and their motivations were described inaccurately, and some people want to make sure that these inaccuracies are not perpetuated.
It's because Lisp macros and their motivations were described inaccurately, and some people want to make sure that these inaccuracies are not perpetuated.