Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Thanks for level headed input.

The majority of technological advancement is done by cautious, slow research not by frenetic leaps and bounds.




"Euraka" moments are fiction; what you get instead is "Huh, that's funny" (afaik).


Subparent that started this. Having had a eureka moment, they definitely exist. That said, it's still 1% inspiration, 99% perspiration. In my case, it's more like 0.00001% inspiration, and all the rest is perspiration.


Debatable. What about "the greatest" advancements?


A little from column A, a little from column B. Einstein worked on relativity for a decade, i think. Newton looks to have spent about 8 years sorting out calculus. A professor once said the Fourier transform was worked out over a couple of weeks in a French chateau accompanied by Fourier's lover. I've never found a source other than that prof's story though.

For me, and i suspect most people, when i work on something hard, i have a lot of ideas. most of them suck. some of them are promising but kind of die on the vine. That one sweet answer though, that idea is memorable. i think it's memorable because of the weeks, months, or years spent validating the idea is good enough.


I agree. Learning everything about something without getting too attached to any point of view makes big leaps forward possible.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: