Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

But, in any case, that's in the cryptographic realm.

Git hashes aren't digital signatures for cryptographic authenticity.




They are.

The git tag and signing verify logic assume the sha-1 hashes for integrity.


Hashing for integrity and authenticity are different things.

For instance, a mere four byte CRC-32 can reasonably assure integrity in some situations, like when used on sufficiently small payload frames; yet it is not useful as a digest for certifying authenticity.

SHA-1 is suitable for integrity.


That it may be, but in git, SHA-1 is also used for authenticity. "Signing a commit" only authenticates one commit, and is considered to authenticate the state of the repository only insofar as it authenticates the SHA-1 references contained in the topmost commit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: