Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tobi1449's comments login

Has any paperless user found a good way to "deskew" scanned pages? Sometimes, when scanning from my Brother printer through the ADF, the pages are skewed/rotated and it can be pretty jarring.


There's this:

https://github.com/the-paperless-project/paperless/issues/20

I don't know if it made it's way into this fork.


Deskew is on by default unless you disabled it?


My guess is the difference lies in the fact that the EU limits credit card fees to something around 0.5% That means the CC companies can't offload the financial burden of this onto the vendors (and they in turn onto their customers), which leads to them having an actual incentive to improve security.


> That means the CC companies can't offload the financial burden of this

Most CC company (CCC) revenue comes from charging the poor people who can't pay their bills ("interest"). Merchant fees are only a small portion of revenue for most cards [1]. In the case of Discover for example it's less than 10% of their revenue, and in the case of Amex it's less than 33%. Other cards fall in-between.

[1] https://www.valuepenguin.com/how-do-credit-card-companies-ma...


Your link explains that the issuing banks charge interest, not the credit card companies - which are merely the payment processors. I don't know all of the companies listed, it's possible that some are two in one and have their own bank as well. Some payment processors are partly owned by major banks too. But take the largest CC company, Visa: They don't extend credit at all, they don't even issue their own cards iirc. All their profit comes from fees, because the fees are too damn high™.

They've successfully convinced the public of the opposite though. It's a very common misconception that only "suckers" who buy on credit pay for it and that everyone else is getting a free service as long as they pay off their cards in time. In reality everyone pays because the merchants have to pay those fees and they pass the cost on to the consumer.


I used CC companies loosely as in {issuing banks + credit card companies} and their collective profit model.

> In reality everyone pays

Not really, credit card companies give you cash back if you pay on time, which is percentage-wise similar to merchant fees.


There's a recurring myth, very prevalent in the US, that credit card companies would prefer people who pay off their bills every month as cheap margin versus being predatory. It's bizarre, and as you've pointed out, completely unsupported by how they actually make their money.


This seems to ignore losses and credit risk entirely. Someone who pays off their bill every month has no credit risk and the fees earned are unimputed revenues. I’m not saying their analysis is entirely wrong, but I would expect unsecured credit losses to be fairly high in the consumer credit market.


The incentive for payment providers to improve their security is a regulation called PSD2 which directly requires strong customer authentication.


French residents are most likely still paying income tax in France (and in Switzerland too), as France most likely has a bilateral tax agreement with Switzerland. They are also taxed according to where their company (or their main place of work) is located. French citizens living in Switzerland only pay taxes in Switzerland.


It‘s also surely only for „security“ that all the neutered adblockers only work with Safari itself and not on any other apps using the Webkit Rendering …


As far as I understood it, Hyper-V is a native hypervisor like Xen or ESXi. So if you're using Hyper-V even your Windows is running as Guest alongside any other Hyper-V VMs and WSL2.


Yes, although it has a "root partition", which could only be Windows up until a month ago[0].

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914112802.80611-1-wei.liu@...


> The DID stop adding stretch goals/scope creep. Probably because it drew major criticism and they simply found out people would throw even more money at them if they simply kept "releasing" new ships (or rather their concept art).


The new ships/concept art I can kinda understand as the artists basically need to wait for the engine most of the time.

Kinda extreme but still not a scam IMO.


It still feels fairly pyramid-schemey. "Purchase now, with expectation of return if others purchase in the future"


I think it's an unfair comparison only because they make it clear that a "pledge" is to support development of the game. Like getting a keychain from a patreon artist.

But it's ultimately unprecedented, and we are all learning as we go. I doubt there will be a crowd funded game like this again for a while.


AFAIK they actually stated that they could complete it without any more funding.


The problem is that as soon as you're getting value from users solving captchas, there's an incentive to show them more captchas to solve before accepting that they're human.


From the post:

> The only issue is the conflict of interest (they benefit from giving me more captchas),


What was the last Windows you installed? Window XP?


Windows 7, for what it's worth. Laptop wifi and ethernet drivers.


What's the difference between this and simply exporting a method of a .net assembly via https://www.nuget.org/packages/UnmanagedExports/ besides having more control over the CLR/.net environment with the method posted here?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: