Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | swarnie's comments login

Always think of your audience before commenting.

no, sometimes it's best to let them dispense their own rope!

Glad you find it funny Chaps, forwarding this to my legal dept.

They haven't the last half dozen times.

Oh cool, five in that list are "Top holdings" of my pension fund.

Which has been hitting dingers for a decade.

Meh....


Its only given up 10 months of gains?

In a 30-40 year investment span its a minor blip.

Call me when WW3 kicks off (maybe Wednesday?) and then we'll talk about a crisis.


I'd like to thank the US tax monkeys for paying my mortgage these past eight years and probably for the next ten.

Mad respect.


You're wel--hey, wait a minute!


Honestly though, we spend more money on worse things. So I'm not even mad. At least the f35 looks cool.


> Remember that the US taxpayer has sunk over $8.5B in secured funding into Intel already and they are eligible for another $11B in USG loans

This is purely so the US can secure a strategic resource ahead of the East China unification wars in a few years, lets not pretend it has anything to do with retaining jobs.


£7.75 GBP, ill admit i haven't used Uber eats in years because the prices are insane but im not sure that covers much more than the delivery fee.

(Also, people who want McDonalds 20 minutes after it was remotely edible and shaken to shit on the back of a moped, who are you? I see the bikes everywhere but have never met one of you irl)


A 20w electric motor is child's play, real women beat the shit out of a horse until it learns to dance.


Sure they can offer it on paper, unsure if it'll be worth anything in four year or even four months.

At least with FAANG you know barring cataclysmic events It'll be valuable down the road.


To each their own. Comparing startup options to mature company RSUs is apples to oranges, and a retelling of the basic trade off between risk and reward. Upside, downside, taxes et. al. combine to inform individual decisions. Both paths have merit. Suggesting startup options are somehow inferior to RSU is simply disingenuous — I would have done much more poorly with RSU than options.


Come on, let’s be realistic. Startup options can have merit sure. Maybe they worked out for you, for some lucky people who make the right bet they work out handsomely. But we can do the math on this. What’s the percentage of say, Series B funded companies that make it to a successful exit, let alone an exit for multiple billions of dollars. It’s really low. So what’s the expected value on an option in a series B startup? You can believe in the company all you want, it doesn’t matter. Good companies fail all the time for reasons out of their control. Unless you’re taking options from a startup very deep in rounds that has a clear path to profitability and is obviously close to IPO there are very few situations where it would make logical sense to take an offer with options over one with RSUs. This is kind of like saying it’s disingenuous to say that working for a salary is better than buying lottery tickets.


If we’re going to be realistic about it, then maybe we should take that $1m RSU grant down a notch or two. Those are extremely, extremely rare. The typical numbers are far lower than that, and if you’ve been there, you know it’s true.

That being the case, the amount of stock options and the exit criteria for an equivalent startup exit are far lower than you posit. It doesn’t need to be a unicorn to put your annual compensation into the mid to upper six figures.


if you think the company's stock is worthless then you shouldn't expect them to be successful enough to compete with FAANG on salary


Consider applying for YC's first-ever Fall batch! Applications are open till Aug 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: