Privately controlled companies need to do what their controllers think is most important. If the Sulzbergers think taking a stand on AI is more important than profit, they can go a long time without increasing profits.
How do you remote access an air-gapped workstation? Seems like you'd need to be constantly switching whether your laptop is on the internet-connected network or the isolated network. If the laptop can switch between them automatically, wouldn't that make it possible for an attacker to jump the gap?
Even just having hosts that are sometimes internet connected and sometimes on the airgap network will greatly weaken the isolation. Stuxnet could cross an airgap with just static media, allowing thousands of computers that sometimes connect to the internet across the airgap seems like a fatal weakness.
The other key detail missing is presumably that the workstation is not air gapped at all, just prevented from accessing the internet with some firewall rules.
For those that don't know: air gapped means completely disconnected, as in literally pull the network cable out the back and never back in again. File transfers have to happen using some physical medium (traditionally write-once CDs/DVDs). You can have an air gapped network so long as the machines are just connected to each other and there's no physical route whatsoever to the internet.
Why is it a misuse to use "crypto" to refer to a currency whose design relies on secrets, but it's fine to use "crypto" to refer to keeping communications private using some secret information?
I do crypto the airport (opening the barriers with my passport, where the computer in my passport signs a challenge encrypted with its pubkey) and do crypto with my phone (making a call, which is encrypted with Ericsson SNOW), and do crypto at the corner shop (using my card, same as the passport).
If airports, phones, and corner shops claimed they 'work in crypto' it would be similarly misleading.
Even Toly refers to himself as a distributed systems engineer, because building a blockchain involves more DS work than crypto work.
Can you give an example of a time when a CEO or board of directors lost a suit for taking the morally upright option instead of trying to maximize share value? I often hear people talking about this, but it's always generalities rather than specific occurrences.
Here's a list of things that were removed from Python in 3.12, most of were deprecated after the 3.0 release.
reply