Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jmsdnns's comments login

p2p cache sharing is an interseting one. it seemed to work for spotify for a long time, but they eventually found it easier to use edge caching. afaik they still use it for places with less developed infrastructure

here is a paper written by the people who designed it: https://www.csc.kth.se/~gkreitz/spotify-p2p10/

this part of the abstract gets right to the point: 8.8% of music data played comes from Spotify's servers while the median playback latency is only 265 ms (including cached tracks)


Steam added a P2P caching mechanism recently and allows downloading games for other local machines that already have the game installed. Greatly helps with avoiding duplicate downloads on a steam deck, for example.

I also added a similar mechanism to my own product years ago. Works flawlessly. Using content based addressing already made it quite easy to implement.


Yes! That is how I think of it too.

They had crossed the chasm and the second adoption bump was starting to explode.

1776 is also the year Adam Smith published Wealth of Nations, and Thomas Paine published Common Sense.


Ben Franklin invented the US, not freedom and democracy. The distinction is important.


Ben Franklin invented distinction, both with and without a difference.


That is probably how Ben Franklin would describe it too, depending on the audience.


Also, football. The real football.


You mean hand egg


Amusingly, football was created as a way to keep people from killing each other after the Civil War.

That's why the game resembles warfare.


Looks like rugby with more protective gear.


It was my intent to describe the article.

The post actually is a tale about how Ben Franklin invented the US, no?


No, it isnt. July 4th happened after the Union was already a thing.


> Fourth of July, is a federal holiday in the United States commemorating the Declaration of Independence, which was ratified by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, establishing the United States of America.

> The main thing to understand, before I go into detail, is that the Declaration of Independence is one of the founding documents, but it did not create a nation. Some of the colonists got together and wrote a historically eloquent letter to the world that basically said, “ayyyy England, F your king!”

Saying "F your king" is an integral part in being independent of England which is a prerequisite to being an independent nation. The Declaration of Independence established the United States as an independent nation. Any previous forms of the United States would have been a colony of England.

> The Continental Association is first time the colonies expressed a collective will to work together in the form of a legal document. It was published October 20, 1774 but went into effect December 1, 1774. The US does not observe December 1 as a national holiday, though it should. It is barely in the cultural memory at all.

The Continental Association is, essentially, where the colonies got together and discussed the idea of independence. The word "colonies" is a dead giveaway. After July 4th, there were no more colonies.

"The Union", referred to by Lincoln. Is not synonymous with the Nation.

The independent nation of the United States of America declared its sovereignty on July 4th, 1776. That's the "correct" way to think about July 4th, aka Independence Day.


It didnt have its sovereignty until the Treaty of Paris was signed in 1783.

You can say whatever day you want is your birthday, but only one day actually is.


The Revolutionary War was over a disagreement between England and the US over the validity of the declared independence on July 4th and the US won that argument when the Treaty of Paris acknowledged the validity of the Declaration of Independence.


> It didnt have its sovereignty until the Treaty of Paris was signed in 1783.

What? You have sovereignty as soon as you decide it. Especially if you are fighting a war to maintain your sovereignty. If the treaty was never signed, the US would still be sovereign.

Try this extreme example. Imagine if the founders decided to simply wipe out the british and there was no brit left to sign any treaty. Would the silly british king still be sovereign over the US even though the silly british king and his silly kingdom no longer existed? Of course not.


Huh, rare to see a monarchist view expressed here.

This is like saying the constitution grants rights.


Because a treaty in Europe determines sovereignty?


A treaty between the breakaway rebels, and the previous claimants to sovereignty, where the previous claimants accept the rebels claims and give up their own, would seem to be a pretty good candidate for the official start date of sovereignty.

The place where the treaty was signed is much less important than what it said and who signed it, even if it ends up being named after that place.


Yes. That's when England recognized it as a nation.


'England', or the United Kingdom?


I mean, your birthday also happens after you are already a thing.


Unless you’re an elf (according to Tolkien), but apparently they gestate for a year so it doesn’t matter.


Actually you’re just a clump of cells until you’re born


You're still a clump of cells


Didn’t the Koreans give up on that recently?


This is my first time writing about history. Would you mind elaborating?


The problem is that I am constantly fatigued in finding out whether what I just read is a snark/joke/hyperbole/exaggeration (which is fun tbh) or a serious historical fact or part of your central thesis.

This is usually quite entertaining in other contexts, but when relaying history which entirely depends on narratives based on facts, it creates fatigue for me.


Thanks! I will keep that in mind next time.


Others might still enjoy it, it’s just my opinion.


At the very least, I can be more intentional about when I am trying to make someone laugh in an otherwise serious essay.

Your opinion is appreciated.


Phrack is my favorite example of a tech zine! It's a classic.

http://www.phrack.org/


Pretty sure not hiring pothead hackers is a bigger problem for the FBI than the encryption they keep whining about.


That was probably Rob Spectre: http://twitter.com/dn0t


Rob also built http://trumpfilter.com/, built http://www.jeterfilter.com/, and sings in Adventure Capitalists: https://adcap.biz


Yup! He's a pretty great speaker. Definitely sold me on Twilio.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: