Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If you read my post you'll see that I ruthlessly edit and cull before posting any of my photos. It's not about that, it's just about keeping the original set. I want to keep everything on hand as I sometimes go back and make videos like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fR4MjImSU0

Or now that I imported them to Google Photos it creates a bunch of GIFs and other fun things for me. If I didn't have the 5 shots of that same thing, etc ,etc, I wouldn't have any of this.




Replying here so that you'll hopefully see it:

WD Red drives do not have head parking disabled. In fact this is a matter of some annoyance in the NAS world, because the default settings (8 second timeout) lead to astronomical SMART Load_Cycle_Count numbers when used in a typical NAS. Google around and you'll see.

Run smartctl on your drives and check the value of Load_Cycle_Count. That's the number of times the drive has come out of head parking. Most of my WD Reds were over 100K before I noticed - the duty limit is 600K. idle3-tools on Linux comes with idle3 tool, which can read and alter the head park timeout.


I remember reading about this issue when I was setting the NAS up and I kept monitoring the load cycle counts but saw nothing out of the norm. Wondering if this was updated in recent drive firmware? I will take a look at that tool though, thanks!


Hey again, so I just checked the Load_Cycle_Count on all the drives. I've been running this setup pretty much 24/7 since February and they all have a count of just 108. It looks like WD fixed this in recent Red batches.


Cool, good to know. I have 11 4TB WD Reds, 10 of which are all in the 100k range (the other one is a warm spare). I was pretty upset when I saw the numbers.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: