Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Forgot to add something relevant to other commenter's claim about needing to be "big" or whatever. I was one of last holdouts of 1 logical function = 1 physical hardware as I liked to customize software for function (esp security TCB). On a related note, having lots of redundant systems for protecting files takes all kinds of servers and is expensive, right? Especially with all that hashing and crypto?

They're called VIA Artigo's:

http://www.ebay.com/sch/items/?_nkw=via+artigo&_sacat=&_ex_k...

Stumbled onto them looking for accelerated crypto & cheaper x86 boxes. So, 6x Artigo at $300 (back then), 3x UPS at $50 each, 2x network switch's at $50, and 12x cables at $5 each = a very high availability solution for 100GB+ data for $2,110 plus tax. Breaking 1TB just took an extra grand or so. At that time, getting a similar level of storage with only two-way redundancy from "bargain" server vendors was more like $10,000-20,000.

Just gotta invest wisely and your problem turns from "cost too much" to "wow I'm sinking a lot of time into this project." The latter is more fun, at least. :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: