The ITU's Child Online Protection initiative notifies Google of child pornography links. Google prmptly removes them from its index.
I expect Microsoft is so notified as well but Satya Nadella doesnt remove the links nor cached images, despite the original servers having been dead for years.
I am convinced that kim dotcom's bust gad nothing to do with copyright but that much of the, uh, "digital media" was distributed from his servers; however most is encrypted, but typically with very obvious or easily brute forced passwords.
More or less you start with bing then pay for a premier account with a filesharing service.
There is also "link protection" mostly our of India, which hides the referring page. One can earn decent coin by promoting a popular ptotected link.
Most of those links are found on what should be dead forums but whose servers are still operating.
An easy way to rain on the mob's parade would be to scout around for threads that go on for hundreds of pages.
The ITU's Child Online Protection initiative notifies Google of child pornography links. Google prmptly removes them from its index.
I expect Microsoft is so notified as well but Satya Nadella doesnt remove the links nor cached images, despite the original servers having been dead for years.
I am convinced that kim dotcom's bust gad nothing to do with copyright but that much of the, uh, "digital media" was distributed from his servers; however most is encrypted, but typically with very obvious or easily brute forced passwords.
More or less you start with bing then pay for a premier account with a filesharing service.
There is also "link protection" mostly our of India, which hides the referring page. One can earn decent coin by promoting a popular ptotected link.
Most of those links are found on what should be dead forums but whose servers are still operating.
An easy way to rain on the mob's parade would be to scout around for threads that go on for hundreds of pages.
http://www.warplife.com/jonathan-swift/books/software-proble...