On: John Carmack working on Scheme as a VR scripting l...

[sklogic]

Firstly, Racket is not a Scheme. There are reader macros and all that bells and whistles. Does this look like S-expressions to you?

https://github.com/soegaard/minipascal

Secondly, even most Schemes allow to use [ ] and { } in addition to ( ).

[ahoge → sklogic]

> Firstly, Racket is not a Scheme.

Did I talk about Racket anywhere?

> Does this look like S-expressions to you?

"MiniPacal implemented in Racket"

Are you really arguing that implementing some other language is the way to go?

https://github.com/eudoxia0/cmacro http://research.swtch.com/shmacro

Totally legit "C".

[sklogic → ahoge]

> Did I talk about Racket anywhere?

This is a thread about Racket, if you did not notice.

> Are you really arguing that implementing some other language is the way to go?

This is exactly what Lisps are about. You've got a nearly raw AST at the bottom (S-expressions) and then you build up a hierarchy of languages on top of it.