If that's how you feel, give examples why. Personally I don't think what is in that post is too far off from reality; "renewable" energy is a net loss still. Nuclear is the cleanest source per measure of energy produced option we have.
1 - Storage. Ignoring developments in storage as part of the build out for renewable power will always make it seem as though you need loads of baseload. And storage is far better developed than fusion. It exists for one thing.
2 - Is ignoring the research done by the grids themselves that indicate they can save money on link upgrades by building out lithium storage systems.
3 - solar panels are nearly all silicon, the storage is mostly lithium and nickel and copper. Some polluting compounds get used, but come on, we are comparing to oil, gas, coal and nuclear. To crap as much in the capital production of devices that last decades as is produced by a chemical fuel economy requiring constant replenishment over the same timescale, would be pretty impressive.
