Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yes, my experience was in the biological sciences, where bench work can have a very long amount of time between iterations. I'm always amazed that anyone working with mammals (eg evaluating transgenic mice) ever finishes their work.

The issue is really the hard cut off that was mentioned above. Had I stayed on longer at that lab, I may have been able to get my results published, but there are many incentives to move on.




This is true. The problem is that when you go looking for a post doc if you don't have any publications then you are thought to be incompetent.


If you were hiring a post doc for a two-year position, would you choose the person who had managed to convert research into a published paper in 3-4 years, or the other guy?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: