Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The Washington Post had a recent article on this saying that basically there is no "hate speech" loophole in the 1st Amendment:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015...

The problem (as usual) with the US law system is that it allows unconstitutional laws to pass through the legislative and executive bodies (which aren't specialized in the Constitution, just in the "will of the People") without official judicial preview. It can then take decades (if ever) to verify if a law that makes something illegal is actually constitutional (at the Supreme Court).

That's how you end up with unconstitutional laws 5 decades later, and some lower Court judges just end up upholding that law because they don't want to upset the cart, allowing for the existence of the law decades more.

See the recent ruling on Patriot Act's bulk collection. It took 14 years just to reach an Appeals Court. If the USA Freedom Act reinstates some of Patriot Act's unconstitutional powers, it may take another 14 years before it reaches the same level.




Bullshit. The bulk connection was not found unconstitutional, it was found illegal because the Patriot act didn't authorise it.


you might want to look up Constitutional avoidance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_avoidance to explain why they ruled the way they ruled.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: