Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Except they heat by increasing molecular dipole rotation which, while not magic, is different to conduction. Which means the heat can penetrate more efficiently.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_heating

I want to be convinced this is better than simply producing charcoal by burning some wood to dry out other wood.




Is heat penetration really an issue with making char from waste wood?

I have seen some very clever designs where the syngas generated by the carbonisation process is used to provide the heat to carbonize the wood. With this approach you can drive the whole process cheaply with a very low carbon loss.


That bit I don't know, hence my caveat.

What I was responding to is that microwave heating certainly is different to other methods.


In practice it is not that different to just rapid heating. The organic chemists have been arguing about this for some time [1] and any non-heating effect is very minor.

1. http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2013/07/09/a_microwave_...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: