Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That is the usual explanation, but I don't think that helps much since counting the number of ways to arrange nothing is confusing!



Not as confusing as you'd think, though, if you invoke the rule of product.

The number of ways to do A and then B is the number of ways to do A times the number of ways to do B. The number of ways to do nothing and then A should be the same as the number of ways to do A. This implies that the number of ways to do nothing is the multiplicative identity, one.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: