> art without an audience is simply selfish folly.
That's like, your opinion, man.
I've heard Watterson does indeed paint, and has showed his paintings to immediate friends and family. There were rumours he was actually exhibiting, on a very small scale and under pseudonym, in his own little community.
"An audience" does not mean "a mass audience". An audience of one (his mother, for example) is still an audience.
That's like, your opinion, man.
I've heard Watterson does indeed paint, and has showed his paintings to immediate friends and family. There were rumours he was actually exhibiting, on a very small scale and under pseudonym, in his own little community.
"An audience" does not mean "a mass audience". An audience of one (his mother, for example) is still an audience.