Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I have vague memories of the fact that qmail was mostly used with patches that DJB didn't want to incorporate, (e.g. support for STARTTLS).

This ended up causing a lot of people to use other servers which _did_ respond to user demands.

So maybe other than only learning from the way he writes code, we can also get some ideas on how to nurture open source projects.




DJB wasn't exactly wrong about TLS, it's been an unending source of security holes for a while now and everybody that's looking at the code expects more. Most of his work is actually dealing with encryption and pointing out flaws in implementations like DNSSEC (which provide no security to the end client).


There's also the licensing, preventing distros from using their own directory layouts. djb says they're being ridiculous and his folder layout is superior (and it is). But it seems to have the opposite effect if it just means packagers decide to simply drop the software :(


The software you're talking about is in the Public Domain.


Only since December 2007:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns#Copyright_status

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qmail#Copyright_status

The change was made because the situation was unfolding exactly as described above.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: