You're missing what I'm saying, and what the point of the original post you replied to was saying. We know what you're saying right now, but that's why this article wasn't as interesting as it could have been if it only surveyed people who were learning profitable trades.
I also dislike the snarky tone you take when referring to "people without useful skills", but that's secondary to the main argument.
I also dislike the snarky tone you take when referring to "people without useful skills", but that's secondary to the main argument.