Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login




Session cookies require no notice. Only persistent cookies and 3rd party cookies require notice, and there are no features on this site that should require them (besides remembering an affirmative response to the cookie warning). In fact there are no features that should require any cookies, save them for logged in users.


Session cookies require no notice.

It's mostly an academic issue at this point -- European governments seem to have realised that this law is very poorly written and even the governments seem to have little interest in either following it themselves or having the relevant authorities enforce it.

That said, I think you're mischaracterising what the letter of the law says. It's not session cookies that are exempt, it's (paraphrased, read at your own risk) cookies that are essential for the normal operation of the site. In practice this probably means session cookies for things like logging in or shopping basket contents, but that's coincidental.


Which is not stupid in theory, but all websites implement it wrong.

It was intended to forbid using tracking cookies without user approval, and this is the intent of the law. Nothing more.


Laws are judged by their effect, not their intent.

Prohibition didn't intend to create organized crime, but that was certainly an effect of it, and that effect influences whether or not it was good law.


There's an ad-block filter specifically for removing these things:

https://github.com/r4vi/block-the-eu-cookie-shit-list

Just add this to your filter list:

https://raw.github.com/r4vi/block-the-eu-cookie-shit-list/ma...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: