I think the problem is not "if you find a frequentist (as opposed to bayesian) statistician", but "if you find a frequentist (as opposed to bayesian) e.g. biologist".
Non-statisticians have been trained using bad, frequentist methods, and one way of forcing them to retrain is by forcing them to learn new statistical tools to get published.
Non-statisticians have been trained using bad, frequentist methods, and one way of forcing them to retrain is by forcing them to learn new statistical tools to get published.