Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
WhitneyLand
on Feb 26, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Psychology Journal Bans Significance Testing
Sorry maybe I'm being dense, but who would take 1 out of 20 success to mean they should start buying rabbit feet?
Mvandenbergh
on Feb 26, 2015
|
next
[–]
Nobody. The problem is that if you conduct 20 trials of the efficacy of rabbit feet, you'd expect 1 trial to show a significant effect. (if you're interpreting P-values the way many people do, incorrectly.)
DanBC
on Feb 26, 2015
|
prev
|
next
[–]
When you do a single trial you might show that rabbits feet are effective.
You don't yet know if this is a 1 in 20 result or a 19 in 20 result.
That's why you replicate.
ejain
on Feb 26, 2015
|
prev
[–]
You'd start buying rabbit feet because only the study that was "successful" is published.
Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: