Indeed Haskell does not automatically make code higher quality than any other language.
On the other hand, Haskell provides more infrastructure for making code reliable than most (or maybe all) mainstream languages.
> Haskell provides more infrastructure for making code reliable than most (or maybe all) mainstream languages.
Is there any empirical evidence that Haskell programs really are more reliable (all else being equal)? Is all that infrastructure actually useful?
Indeed Haskell does not automatically make code higher quality than any other language.
On the other hand, Haskell provides more infrastructure for making code reliable than most (or maybe all) mainstream languages.