If you want to give away something for free, why should you be forced to spend time and effort (and possibly money) to increase the value of your free offering?
Can you see why this would have a stifling effect on giving things away for free?
What would be the net gain to the world - is it better to have only a few free things that are accessible, or have many free things, only a fraction of which are accessible?
Making things accessible isn't free. Somebody has to pay. Forcing the producer to pay will reduce production. It's that simple.
Can you see why this would have a stifling effect on giving things away for free?
What would be the net gain to the world - is it better to have only a few free things that are accessible, or have many free things, only a fraction of which are accessible?
Making things accessible isn't free. Somebody has to pay. Forcing the producer to pay will reduce production. It's that simple.