You're wrong. The laws Obama is planning to strike down are entirely reasonable; they prevent people from being _compelled_ to fund municipal broadband. That is, there is a difference between:
a) some people setting up a non-profit to offer broadband, provided by voluntary donations, sponsorship, whatever
and
b) local Government taxing people to offer same
The former is as I understand it entirely legal, and entirely compatible with a free market.
a) some people setting up a non-profit to offer broadband, provided by voluntary donations, sponsorship, whatever
and
b) local Government taxing people to offer same
The former is as I understand it entirely legal, and entirely compatible with a free market.